期刊文献+

公共对话:近十年国外研究的理论与实践 被引量:3

Public Dialogue Research Abroad:A Synopsis of Theory and Practice of the Past Decade
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从公共对话理论发展的谱系来看,自古希腊以来,关于对话和协商的研究便是许多经典政治哲学家讨论的主题。近10年来,由于社会治理实践层面的需要,国外学者在一个新的层面对公共对话进行了深入的研究,研究主题涉及到公共对话的形成、公共对话的理论基础、公共对话的意涵和公共对话的合法性维度等。在实践层面,公共对话被成功地运用于教育、环保、科技政策和社区治理等公共管理领域。当然,一些现实的理性主义者也批评了公共对话在公共领域,特别是在科技发展政策领域运用的局限。 Since ancient Greece,many political philosophers have begun to research the theme of dialogue and consultation.In Recent Years,many foreign scholars restarted to research the public dialogue for the request of social practical governance.On a theoretical level,they have touched on many topics such as the formation of public dialogue,the theoretical basis for public dialogue,the meaning and legitimacy of public dialogue and so on.On a practical level,as a kind of governance mechanism,public dialogue has been successfully applied to the education domain,environmental protection domain,science and technology and community governance domain.But some realistic rationalists have criticized the public dialogue after it was used in the science and technology development policy.
出处 《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第4期143-149,共7页 Journal of Capital Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 公共对话 公民参与 国外研究 Public dialogue Citizen participation Foreign research
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Susan Collins,Michael Kerseyand Cindy Savage,Local dialogue heard around the world,World Futures,2007(Issues &6).
  • 2庄庆鸿.将利益表达与社会稳定一致起来[N].中国青年报,2010-04-19.
  • 3Anthony Perret,BNFL national stakeholder dialogue case study in public affairs,Journal of public Affairs,2003,(4).
  • 4Jennifer Duffield Hamilton and Caitlin Wills-Toker,Reconceptualizing Dialogue in Environmental Public Participation,the Policy Studies Jounal,2006,(4).
  • 5[EB/OL].http://www.parliament.uk/post/home.htm.
  • 6Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology,Open Channels:Public dialogue in science and technology,March 2001.
  • 7Nancy C.Roberts,Keeping Public Officials Accountable through Dialogue:Resolving the Accountability Paradox,Public Administration Review,2002,(6).
  • 8[美] 南茜·弗雷泽.正义的中断[M].于海清译.上海:上海人民出版社,2009.
  • 9[德] 哈贝马斯.交往行为理论(第1卷)[M].上海:上海人民出版社,2005.
  • 10[德] 尤尔根·哈贝马斯.包容他者[M].曹卫东,译.上海:上海人民出版社,2002.

共引文献6

同被引文献70

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部