西方教育创新理论的演变被引量：1

The Evolution of Western Theories of Educational Innovation

导出

摘要 20世纪60年代以来,西方教育创新研究大体经历了三个发展阶段:20世纪60年代的技术视角;20世纪70年代的政治视角;20世纪80年代以来的组织文化视角。总体而言,技术视角将重心放在创新的采纳上,政治视角批判性地分析了创新过程中的权力关系,组织文化视角则探究了学校文化和行为模式对于创新的影响。 The study of western theories of educational innovation can be roughly divided into three stages since 1960＇s. Accordingly, there appeared three perspectives, i.e. technological, political and organizational-cultural. Generally, technological perspective focused on factors influencing the adoption of innovation. Political perspective critically analyzed the power structure in the process of educational innovation. Organizational-cultural perspective explored the impacts of school culture and behavioral patterns on innovation.

作者孟照海

机构地区北京师范大学经济与工商管理学院

出处《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第8期57-61,共5页 International and Comparative Education

关键词教育创新技术视角政治视角组织文化视角 educational innovation technological perspective political perspective organizational-cultural perspective

分类号 G40-01 [文化科学—教育学原理]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献27

1项贤明.比较视野中的教育现代化进程[J].比较教育研究,2007,28(12):1-7. 被引量：33
2Richard Carlson. Adoption of Educational Innovation, Eugene: University of Oregon Press, 1965.10.
3Tom Whiteside. The Sociology of Educational Innovation, London: Methuen & Co. Ltd, 1978.34,26.
4Andy Hargreaves and Ivor Goodson. Educational Change over Time? The Sustainability and Nonsustainability of Three Decades of Secondary School. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2006, 42( 1 ) : 3-41.
5John Nisbet. Innovation: Bandwagon or Hearse? In: Alan Harris, Martin Lawn & William Prescott (ed.). Curriculum Innovation.New York:John Wiley & Sons Inc., 1975. 1 - 14.
6David Tyack and William Tobin. The "Grammar" of Schooling: Why Has It Been so Hard to Change. American Educational Research Journal, 1994, 31 (3) : 453-479.
7George Papagiannis, Steven Klees and Robert Bickel. Toward a Political Economy of Educational Innovation. Review of Educational Research, 1982, 52(2) : 245-290.
8Paul Berman and Milbrey McLaughlin. Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol.VIII: Implementing and Sustaining Innovations.Santa Monica, CA : Rand, 1975. 14.
9Henry Mintzberg. The Organization as Political Arena. Journal of Management Studies, 1985,22(2) : 133-155.
10Linda Smircich. Concepts of Cuhure and Organizational Analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983,28 (3) : 339-358.

二级参考文献9

1[英]伊丽莎白·劳伦斯.现代教育的起源和发展[M].北京:北京语言学院出版社,1992.
2[美]E.P.克伯雷选编.外国教育史料[C].任宝祥等译.武汉:华中师范大学出版社,1991.367,396.
3[日]麻生诚等.教育与日本现代化[M].刘付忱译.北京:人民教育出版社,1980.5.
4[美]S.亨廷顿等.现代化理论与历史经验的再探讨[M].上海:上海译文出版社,1993.330.
5[美]C.E.布莱克.现代化的动力-一个比较史的研究[M].景跃进等译.杭州:浙江人民出版社,1985.5.
6金耀基.传统与现代[M].台湾:时报文化出版事业有限公司,1978.
7孙立平等.国外发展理论研究[C].北京:人民出版社.1992.38.
8[美]Fritz K. Ringer, Education and Society in Modern Europe, Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press, 1979. 1.
9[德]里夏德·范迪尔门(R.van Dulmen)欧洲近代生活[M].第3卷“巫术、宗教和启蒙运动”[A].王亚平译.北京:东方出版社,2005.159.