摘要
"隐喻"与"习语"是语言哲学及认知语言学著述中的高频词汇,也是哲学及认知科学研究的题中之义。梳理隐喻及习语的定义,阐释并厘清二者的内在联系,有助于逼近并揭示一系列语言哲学及认知语言学框架下的核心问题。本文拟将通过对隐喻与习语的比较研究来考察:习语与隐喻能否被拆分?隐喻是不是习语的认知机制之一?习语能否被定义为死隐喻,习语与隐喻能否被改述(paraphrase)、能否被翻译等一系列重要的语言哲学问题。
As key notions in the fields of philosophy and cognitive linguistics, ＂metaphor＂ and ＂idiom＂ have attracted scholars＇ attention and have been discussed frequently in the works concerned here and there. By virtue of clarifying their definitions and interlocked relations, some significant issues in philosophy and cognitive linguistics could be uncovered. This essay aims at exploring the following questions by comparing metaphors and idioms： 1 ） Are metaphors and idioms decomposable？ 2） Can metaphors function as the fundamental mechanism in idiomatic interpretation？ 3 ） Is idiom a dead metaphor in nature？ 4） Are there any possibilities to get them paraphrased and translated？
出处
《西安外国语大学学报》
2010年第3期38-41,共4页
Journal of Xi’an International Studies University
关键词
隐喻
习语
可拆分性
死隐喻
改述
可译性
metaphor
idiom
decomposability
dead metaphor
paraphrase
translatability
