期刊文献+

经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术 被引量:10

Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic liver cyst fenestration
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 总结经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术的临床应用初期经验,探讨其可行性、安全性及技术方法.方法 回顾性分析2009年11月至2010年6月解放军总医院采用经脐下缘置入3个相邻的5 mmTrocar方法,完成4例经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术患者的临床资料.术中使用常规5 mm腹腔镜器械及5nm 30°腹腔镜,手术步骤同传统腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术.结果 4例患者均顺利完成手术,其中1例联合胆囊切除,平均手术时间38 min(25~70 min),术中无明显出血,无中转开腹或转为传统多孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术.所有患者于术后1~3 d出院,住院及随访期间无任何手术相关并发症发生.结论 经脐单孔腹腔镜肝囊肿开窗术切口美观,恢复快,安全可行,但需要一定的腹腔镜手术技巧和严格掌握适应证. Objective To determine the feasibility, safety and techniques of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic liver cyst fenestration. Methods From November 2009 to June 2010, four cases of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic liver cyst fenestration were completed through three adjacent 5 mm trocars around the umbilicus. Normal 5 mm laparoscopic instruments and a 5 mm 30° laparoscope were utilized, and the procedures were similar to conventional multi-port laparoscopic liver cyst fenestration. Results All operations were completed successfully, with no conversion to laparotomy or the multi-port laparoscopic procedure. The mean operation time was 38 minutes (25-70 minutes). All patients were discharged at postoperative days 1-3, and no complications or cyst recurrence occurred during hospitalization and follow-up. Conclusions Transumbilical single-port laparoscopic liver cyst fenestration is safe and feasible. It has the advantages of less pain, cosmetic incision and quick recovery, but is technique-demanding.
出处 《中华消化外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第4期292-294,共3页 Chinese Journal of Digestive Surgery
关键词 经自然腔道内镜手术 外科手术 微创性 肝囊肿开窗术 腹腔镜 Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, umbilical Laparoscopy Surgical procedures, minimally invasive Liver cyst fenestration, laparoscopic
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献11

  • 1John R. Romanelli,David B. Earle.Single-port laparoscopic surgery: an overview[J].Surgical Endoscopy.2009(7)
  • 2Podolsky ER,Mouhlas A,Wu AS.Single Port Access (SPA)laparoscopic ventral hernia repair:initial report of30cases[].Surgical Endoscopy.2010
  • 3Lee YS,Kim JH,Moon EJ,et al.Comparative study on surgical outcomes and operative costs of transumbilical single-port laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy in adult patients[].Surgical Laparoscopy and Endoscopy.2009
  • 4Vidal O,Valentini M,Ginest C,et al.Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery appendectomy[].Surgical Endoscopy.2009
  • 5Targarona EM,Balague C,Martinez C,et al.Single-Port Access:A Feasible Alternative to Conventional Laparoscopic Splenectomy[].Surg Innov.2009
  • 6Nguyen NT,Slone J,Reavis K.Comparison study of conventional laparoscopic gastric banding versus laparoendoscopic single site gastric banding[].Surg Obes Relat Dis.2009
  • 7Rivas H,Varela E,Scott D.Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy:initial evaluation of a large series of patients[].Surgical Endoscopy.2009
  • 8Schlager A,Khalaileh A,Shussman N,et al.Providing more through less:current methods of retraction in SIMIS and NOTES cholecystectomy[].Surgical Endoscopy.2009
  • 9Canes D,Desai MM,Aron M,et al.Transumbilical single-port surgery:evolution and current status[].European Urology.2008
  • 10Jung YW,Kim SW,Kim YT.Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology[].European Journal of Gynaecological Oncology.2009

共引文献20

同被引文献79

引证文献10

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部