期刊文献+

45例胰腺癌临床疗效分析

Clinical evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy in 45 cases of pancreatic carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨胰腺癌不同治疗方式与临床疗效及预后的关系。方法将2000年1月至2006年12月收治的45例胰腺癌患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析,用COX比例风险模型对可能影响胰腺癌疗效的指标进行多因素分析,并用Kaplan-Meier法计算生存率。结果总有效率CR+PR为82.2%);1,2年生存率分别为24.4%和8.9%;中位生存期8个月。单因素分析显示,Karnofsky评分、肿瘤位置、CA-199、是否手术、临床分期、治疗情况、近期疗效、CBR与治疗疗效存在相关性。多因素分析显示,Karnofsky评分≥70分;CA-199疗前升高,治疗后恢复正常者;近期疗效达CR/PR者可望提高生存率。结论 Karnofsky评分、CA-199、近期疗效是影响胰腺癌预后的因素。 Objective To investigate the relation between different therapy and the clinical efficacy,prognosis for pancreatic carcinoma.Methods Forty-five patients with pancreatic carcinoma during Jan-Dec,2006,were retrospectively studied according to treatment methods.The factors influencing survival were analyzed using univariate analysis(Log-rank) and multivariate(COX′s proportional hazard regression model) analysis methods.Results The overall response rate was 37/45(82.2%).The 1-,2-year survival rates were 11/45(24.4%),4/45(8.9%) and the median survival duration was 8 months.The single factor analysis showed that KPS scores,the tumor site,CA-199,whether operation or not,clinical stage,the therapy methods,the curative effect and CBR had influence on survival period.Multivariate analysis showed that the patients who had KPS scores≥70,increase in level of pretreatment baseline CA-199 and decrease in level of CA-199 after therapy and short-term curative effect attaining CR/PR were hopeful of prolonging survival.Conclusion KPS scores,CA-199,the curative effect were the significant factors affecting the survival.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2010年第4期363-365,369,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 胰腺肿瘤 疗效 多因素分析 Pancreatic neoplasms Therapeutic efficacy Multivariate analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics [ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin ,2005,55 : 10-30.
  • 2Sandberg A, Neoptolemos JP. Resection for pancreatic in the new millennium [ J ]. Pancreatology,2002,2 ( 5 ) :431-439.
  • 3Pedrazzoli S, Dicarlo V, Dionigi R, et al. Standard versus extended lymphadenectomy associated with pancreatoduodenectomy in the surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas : a multi-center, prospective, randomized study [ J ]. Ann Surg, 1998,228:508-517.
  • 4Popiela T, Kedra B, Sierzega M, et al. Patients with non-advanced pancreatic cancer benefit from extended lymphadenectomy [ J ]. Zentralbl Chir,2002,127 ( 11 ) :960-964.
  • 5Lim JE, Chien MW, Earle CC. Prognostic factors following curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma:a population-based, linked database analysis of 396 patients [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2003, 237:74-85.
  • 6Muscari F,Suc B,Kirzin S. Risk factors for mortality and intraabdominal complications after pancreatoduodenectomy: muhivariate analysis in 300 patients [ J ]. Surgery,2006,139 (5) :591-598.
  • 7Wagner M, Redaelli C, Lietz M, et al. Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma[ J]. Br J Surg, 2004,91:586-594.
  • 8Sezgln C, Karabulut B, Uslu R, et al. Gemcitabine treatment in patients with inoperable locally advanced metastatic pancreatic cancer and prognostic factors [ J ]. Gastroenterology, 2005,40 : 1486-1492.
  • 9Cruciani RA, Jain S. Pancreatic pain : a mini review [ J ]. Pancreatology,2008,8 (3) :230-235.
  • 10Van Geenen RC, Keyzer-Dekker CM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Pain management of patients with unresectable peripancreatic carcinoma [ J ]. World J Surg,2002,26 (6) :715-720.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部