期刊文献+

经尿道选择性绿激光前列腺汽化术与前列腺电切术治疗重度良性前列腺增生的对比研究 被引量:11

Comparative study on efficacy of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate and transur ethral resection of prostate for treatment of enlarged benign prostatic hyperplasia
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较经尿道选择性绿激光前列腺汽化术与前列腺电切术治疗重度良性前列腺增生症的临床疗效。方法将63例重度良性前列腺增生症患者随机分为经尿道选择性绿激光前列腺汽化术(PVP)组32例和前列腺电切术(TURP)组31例,分别行PVP术与TURP术。观察两组患者手术时间、住院时间、保留导尿管时间、手术出血量、IPSS评分、最大尿流率、前列腺体积的变化及并发症。结果所有手术均成功,无严重手术并发症发生。TURP组电切综合征、输血病例各2例,PVP组无该并发症。PVP组手术出血量、输血率、住院时间及留置导尿管时间明显少于TURP组(P>0.05),然而,PVP组的手术时间、术后感染控制时间、早期急性尿潴留发生率及残留腺体体积明显大于TURP组。两组术后IPSS评分下降率、最大尿流率差异、感染发生率及逆行射精发生率差别均无显著性(P>0.05)。结论治疗重度良性前列腺增生时,PVP手术具有一定的局限性,可作为TURP的一种补充手术方法应用于高危患者的治疗,而不作重度良性前列腺增生的首选治疗方法。 Objective To comparatively analyze the efficacy of greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate (PVP) and transuretharal resection of prostate (TURP) for treatment of enlarged benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods Sixty-three consecutive patients with enlarged benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomly divided into groupl(n =32) treated with PVP and group2 (n= 31) treated with TURP. Operative data, hospitalization periods, blood loss, catheter removal, international prostate symptom score (IPSS), maximum flow rates (Qmax), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) volumes and complications of the treated patients were recorded. Results Baseline characteristics of both groups were similar. Two patients treated by TURP received a blood transfusion. The time of catheter removal and hospital stay were significantly longer and the risk of blood transfusion was higher in group2 than that of groupl. However, the operation time and the time of infection control were significantly longer, the rate of acute urinary retention and the percentage volume residual were significantly higher in groupl than that of group2. No significant differences were found in IPSS, Q and the incidence of urethral strictures (P〉0.05). Conelution Our results suggested that transuretharal resection of prostate (TURP) should be recommendated as first choice for treatment of enlarged benign prostatic hyperplasia, and greenlight photoselective vaporization of prostate(PVP) was used as a supplement therapy.
出处 《中国男科学杂志》 CAS CSCD 2010年第8期23-25,29,共4页 Chinese Journal of Andrology
关键词 激光 经尿道前列腺切除术 前列腺增生 lasers transurethral resection of prosatate prostatic hyperplasia
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12- month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol 2004; 172(4): 1404- 1408.
  • 2林考兴,王鑫洪.良性前列腺增生症发病概况[J].临床军医杂志,2004,32(2):102-103. 被引量:24
  • 3Barber N, Muir GH. High-power KTP laser prostatectomy: the new challenge to transurethral resection of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol 2004; 14(1): 21-25.
  • 4Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, et al. Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology 2008; 71(2): 247-251.
  • 5Ruszat R, Lehmann K, Wyler S, et al. 24 months results of a prospective Bi-Center study of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Eur Urol Suppl 2007; 6:192.
  • 6Mebust WK, Holtgrewe HL, Cockett AT, et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients. J Urol 1989; 141:243-247.
  • 7Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, et al. High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol 2005; 173(1): 158-160.
  • 8Bachmann A, Schtl rch L, Ruszat R, et al. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol 2005; 48(6): 965-71, discussion 972.
  • 9Bouchier-Hayes DM, Anderson P, Van Appledom S, et al. KTP laser versus transurethral resection: early results of a randomized trial. J Endourol 2006; 20(8): 580-585.
  • 10Malek RS, Kuntzman RS. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate: 5-year experience with high power KTP laser. J Urol 2003; 169(4 Suppl): 390.

二级参考文献21

共引文献23

同被引文献94

  • 1程华根,王传圣.经尿道前列腺电切术联合耻骨上膀胱穿刺造瘘引流治疗重度前列腺增生的疗效分析[J].黑龙江医学,2013,37(3):177-179. 被引量:6
  • 2叶敏,朱英坚,王伟明,黄云腾,沈海波.经尿道前列腺电切术与汽化切除术的并发症分析[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(8):563-566. 被引量:135
  • 3肖峻,诸禹平.前列腺增生症腔内激光治疗进展[J].国外医学(老年医学分册),2007,28(3):133-137. 被引量:3
  • 4那彦群,孙光,叶章群,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南指导手册[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:97-103.
  • 5Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R. Complications of tran- surethral resection of the Prostate (TURP)-incidence, management, and prevention [J].Eur Urol, 2006, 50 (5) :969-980.
  • 6Seiler D, Zbinden R, Hauri D, et al. Four glass or two glass test for chronic Prostatitis[J]. Urology, 2003, 42(2) :238-242.
  • 7Tzortzis V, Gravas S, Rosette J. Minimally invasive sur- gical treatments for benign prostatic hyperplasia [J].Eur Urol, 2009, 8(6) :513-522.
  • 8Mebust M K, Holtgrewe H L, Cockrtt A T K, et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. A cooperative study of 13 participatingin stitutions evaluating 3,885 patients[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(2 Pt 2) :999-1003.
  • 9Ruszat R, Lehmannk K, Wyler S, et al. 24 months re- sults of a prospective Bi-Center study of photoselective ve- porization of the prastate(PVP) versus transurethral resec- tion of the prostate(TURP) [J]. Eur Urol Suppl, 2007, 6 (2) :192.
  • 10Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A. Greenlight laser in benign prostatic hyperplasia: turning green into gold [J].Curt Opin Urol, 2008, 18(1 ) :46-49.

引证文献11

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部