期刊文献+

氟保护漆与光固化窝沟封闭剂的防龋效果比较 被引量:5

Clinical comparison between fluor protector and light cured pit and fissure sealant for caries-preventive effect
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较氟保护漆与光固化窝沟封闭剂预防下颌年轻第一恒磨牙窝沟龋的临床效果。方法应用两种材料对72名儿童进行下颌第一恒磨牙同体对照封闭实验,左侧用氟保护漆,右侧用光固化窝沟封闭剂,于0.5年、1年、1.5年观察三次龋病发生情况。结果1.5年后左、右侧下颌第一恒磨牙龋病发病率均无统计学意义。结论氟保护漆与光固化窝沟封闭剂均有良好的防龋效果。 Objective:To compare the caries-preventive effect between fluor protector and light cured pit and fissure sealant on mandibular first permanent molars pit and fissure caries.Methods: The first permanent molars in the mandibular of 72 children were treated respectively with fluor protector(left side) and light cured pit and fissure sealant(right side),and incidence of caries were examined respectively after 0.5、1 and 1.5 years.Results: No significant differences of incidence of caries were detected after1.5 years.Conclusion: Both fluor protector and light cured pit and fissure sealant have good clinical effect in caries-preventive.
出处 《泰山医学院学报》 CAS 2010年第6期448-450,共3页 Journal of Taishan Medical College
关键词 氟保护漆 光固化窝沟封闭剂 龋病发病率 fluor protector light cured pit and fissure sealant incidence of caries
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献34

  • 1杨东梅,李玉晶,葛丽华,高志华,姚蓓,应平.氟钼酸铵溶液对人工根面龋作用的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1995,30(5):274-276. 被引量:10
  • 2张举之.口腔内科学(第3版)[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1995.390-391.
  • 3李玉晶 仇新全 等.氟化氨银溶液防龋抑龋作用的研究[J].中华口腔医学杂志,1984,19(2):97-97.
  • 4Ericsson Y, Andersson R. Caries Res, 1983,17:277-278
  • 5Twetman S, Petersson LG, Pakhomov GN. Caries Res, 1996,30(5):347-353
  • 6Shellis RP, Duckworth RM. Int Dent J, 1994,44(3 Supple 1 ):263-273
  • 7Van Loveren C, Buijs JF, Buijs M J, et al. Caries Res, 1996,30(1 ):45-51
  • 8Skold-Larsson K, Modeer T, Twetman S. Clin Oral Investing, 2000,4(1):31-34
  • 9Autio-Gold JT, Courts F. J Am Dent Assic, 2001,132(9): 1247-1253
  • 10吴煜 将贵发 黄文景.广西预防医学,2002,18(5):339-340.

共引文献20

同被引文献35

引证文献5

二级引证文献100

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部