期刊文献+

论国际环境法“共同责任”原则 被引量:3

On the "Common Responsibility" Principle of the International Environmental Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 学界对于国际环境法基本原则的认识上一直存有争议,目前尚不统一。在阐明国际环境法基本原则特点的基础上,从学理论证和文本实证的角度分析"共同责任"和"共同但有区别责任",明确"共同责任"是国际环境法的基本原则,而"共同但有区别责任"仅是"共同责任"基本原则在国际气候变化应对领域中的具体运用。 Whether or not the "common responsibility" or the "common but differentiated responsibility" is the basic principle is not settled yet.Many Chinese scholars draw the conclusion on the wrong basis of inner environmental law.Based on the theory of international environmental law and the international environmental instruments,it is said that the "common responsibility" is the basic principle,for it reflects the spirits and is suitable in all scope of the international environmental law.The "common but differentiated responsibility" is only the application of the "common responsibility" principle in the international air pollution and climate change domain.Thus the "common but differentiated responsibility" can not evolved into a customary international law.Nevertheless it is of significance and ought to be insisted on by developing countries and is to grow into a concrete principle in the climate change sector,if used correctly.
作者 傅前明
出处 《山东师范大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 北大核心 2010年第4期97-100,共4页 Journal of Shandong Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
关键词 国际环境法 共同责任 基本原则 共同但有区别责任 international environmental law common responsibility basic principle common but differentiated responsibility
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献31

  • 1杨兴.试论国际环境法的共同但有区别的责任原则[J].时代法学,2003,1(1):83-93. 被引量:26
  • 2Anita Margrethe Halvorssen, Equality Among Unequals in International Environmental Law. Boulder, Westview Press,1999.
  • 3See Christopher D. Stone, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities in International Law. American Journal of International Law, vol. 98, pp. 276 -301 .
  • 4Paul G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibilities: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Environmental Law Journal, vol. 7, pp. 27 -40.
  • 5Rumu Sarkar, Critical Essay: Theoretical Foundations in Development Law: A Reconciliation of Opposites? Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, vol. 33, summer 2005, pp. 367 - 378.
  • 6See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, UN Doc. A/Conf. 151/5/Rev. 1,13 June 1992.
  • 7See Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, Stockholm, UN Doc. A/Conf. 48/14, 16 June 1972.
  • 8See P.G. Harris, Common but Differentiated Responsibility: The Kyoto Protocol and United States Policy. New York University Envirenmental Law Journal, vol. 7, 1999, p. 27.
  • 9See Article 5, the Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer, 1987.
  • 10See Ratification[ EB/OL], http ://ozone. unep. org/Treaties_and_Ratification/2006 - 5 - 31.

共引文献39

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部