期刊文献+

面向车削颤振抑制的多重阻尼器优化设计 被引量:12

Optimization of multiple tuned mass dampers for chatter suppression in turning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在相同质量比下,多重阻尼器相对单阻尼器具有抑振频带更宽及效果更佳等一系列优点。以往针对阻尼器的参数优化大多采取H∞或H2方法,即最小化主结构振动幅值的最大值或有效值。然而机床加工中发生的颤振是一种特殊的自激振动;对车削而言,无颤振的临界切深仅由刀具-工件相对频响函数的负实部决定。通过应用多重阻尼器于机械加工中再生颤振的抑制,研究以获取最大稳定无颤振切深为目的阻尼器设计优化路线。在建立多重阻尼器抑制主结构目标函数,即最大化刀尖频响函数负实部最小值的基础上,构造minimax方法对多重阻尼器的刚度及阻尼进行优化。以抑制车床夹具某一主模态为例,结合实验模态分析,采用该方法调制阻尼器,并和以往的优化方法进行对比。切削实验表明,该优化方法能进一步提升多重阻尼器的颤振抑制性能;相对H∞优化方法,该方法可提高无颤振临界切深52%。 Multiple tuned mass dampers (TMDs) are superior to the single TMD with the same mass in the bandwidth and effectiveness for vibration control, and the most adopted optimization methods for TMDs are H∞or H2 (i. e. minimization of the amplitude or root mean squared value of the vibration). However, the chatter vibration in the machine tool is a special self- excited problem. Especially for turning, the chatter-free depth of cut is only determined by the negative real part of the rela- tive frequency response function (FRF) between the tool and workpiece. The objective function of multiple TMDs damping the primary structure was formulated (i. e. maximizing the most negative point of tool point FRF), and the minimax approach was employed to optimize the stiffness and damping of each TMD. The advantage of the proposed method was validated by tuning three TMDs on a specially designed fixture of a turning machine after performing the modal test. The cutting tests demonstrate that the tuning method can further increase the chatter suppression performance of multiple TMDs, and the chatter free depth of cut can be increased 52 % more than the H∞ method.
出处 《振动工程学报》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期468-474,共7页 Journal of Vibration Engineering
基金 国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2006BAF01B09) 教育部博士点基金资助项目(200800060010) 北京市重点实验室项目资助
关键词 多重阻尼器 颤振 抑制 车削 优化 multiple tuned mass dampers chatter suppression turning optimization
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Altintas Y. Manufacturing Automation [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  • 2Tobias S A. Machine-tool Vibration [M].London: Blackie, 1965.
  • 3Koenigsberger F, Tlusty J. Machine Tool Structures[M]. Oxford: Pergamon, 1970.
  • 4Rashid A, Nicolescu C M. Design and implementation of tuned viscoelastic dampers for vibration control in milling[J]. International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 2008,48(9) : 1 036-1 053.
  • 5Den Hartog J P. Mechanical Vibrations[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1934.
  • 6Brock J E. A note on the damped vibration absorber [J].Journal of Applied Mechanics, 1946, 13 (4): A284.
  • 7Warburton G B, Ayorinde E O. Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1980, 8(3) : 197- 217.
  • 8Asami T, Nishihara O, Baz A M. Analytical solutions to H∞ and H2 optimization of dynamic vibration absorbers attached to damped linear systems [J]. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics, 2002, 124 (2): 284-295.
  • 9刘耀宗,郁殿龙,赵宏刚,温熙森.被动式动力吸振技术研究进展[J].机械工程学报,2007,43(3):14-21. 被引量:57
  • 10Xu K, Igusa T. Dynamic characteristics of multiple substructures with closely spaced frequencies [J]. Earthquake Engineering and Structure Dynamics, 1992, 21(12):1 059-1 070.

二级参考文献129

共引文献102

同被引文献96

引证文献12

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部