摘要
关于《注解伤寒论》所据之祖本,一般认为其本于林亿等校定的宋本《伤寒论》,然通过对成注本与宋臣校定本《伤寒论》的对校,发现异文特多,难以均用误写来解释。且某些异文,成注本虽与林校本有异,然与《金匮玉函经》中相应的文字同,说明此等异文非成公任意改动所致。又宋代《伤寒论》传本众多,如将《伤寒补亡论》中引《伤寒论》文与林校本对校,发现郭氏引文所据之底本非为林校官定本,即宋代研究《伤寒论》者不一定均采用林亿等校定之官本,成注本之祖本亦非本于林校本。
Many scholars believe that the original edition of Zhu Jie Shang Han Lun is the Song edi-tion of Shang Han Lun proofreaded and corrected by Lin Yi. After comparing Shang Han Lun proofread-ed and corrected by Lin Yi with that by Cheng's, it is found that there are many different words betweenthem, which are difficult to be explained by that all these different words are caused by Cheng Wuji's neg-ligence. Although some words in Zhu Jie Shang Han Lun are different from that in Shang Han Lun proof-readed and corrected by Lin Yi, part of these words are identical with that in Jin Gui Yu Han Jing,hence, the conclusion that these different words aren't caused by Cheng Wuji's arbitrary changes. Thereare many different editions of Shang Han Lun in the Song dynasty, for example, when comparing ShangHan Lun quoted by Guo Yong in Shang Han Bu Wang Lun with Shang Han Lun proofreaded and cor-rected by Lin Yi, it is found that.the original edition used by Guo Yong is not the edition proofreaded andcorrected by Lin Yi, but not all the scholars studying Shang Han Lun in the Song dynasty adopted ShangHan Lun proofreaded and corrected by Lin Yi, the original edition used by Cheng Wuji is not the editionproofreaded and corrected by Lin Yi.
出处
《中华医史杂志》
CAS
1999年第2期104-108,共5页
Chinese Journal of Medical History
关键词
注解伤寒论
祖本
文献研究
Zhu Jie Shang Han Lun, The original edition, Textual research