期刊文献+

两种空中防碰撞评估方法的比较 被引量:1

Two Comparative Assessments About Preventing Aerial Collision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对近十几年内中国民航的多起危险接近事件,以及世界航空史上的空中相撞事故进行了细致的分析.深入讨论了两种空中防碰撞的评估方法,详细描述了用基准系统比较法和临界值评估法进行评估的流程,并比较分析了两种方法的优缺点.对未来繁忙空域中,空中碰撞风险的安全性评估提供了评估依据和指导建议. The author carries out detailed researches and analyses about the several dangerous approaching incidents happened to Civil Aviation Administration of China(CAAC) on the last ten years,and several air crash accidents in the world aviation history.Then carries out in-depth discussion about the two assessments of preventing aerial collision,Reference System assessing method and Threshold Limit Value(TLV) assessing method,respectively.The author also describes the procedures for these two assessments,and compares their superiorities and inferiorities.These two assessments provide basis and guidable recommentdations for the future security assessment of aerial transportation in the busy airspace.
作者 宋若嘉
出处 《辽宁大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 2010年第3期248-251,共4页 Journal of Liaoning University:Natural Sciences Edition
关键词 防碰撞 评估 基准系统 临界值 Anti-collision Assessments Reference System Threshold Limit Value
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1中国民用航空总局航空安全办公室.中国民航航空安全报告[R].北京:中国民航总局,2006:31-35.
  • 2Blom H,Bakker B,M,Marco B E.Stochastic analysis background of accident risk assessment for air traffic management.[EB/J].[2003:11-13].http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi:10.1.1.143.9460&rep:rep1&type =pdf.
  • 3Reich P G.Analysis of long-range air traffic systems:separation standards ⅠⅡⅢ[J].Journal of the Institute of Navigation,1966,19(1):88-98; 1966,19(2):169-186; 1966,19(3):331-347.
  • 4Brooker P.Lateral collision risk in air traffic systems:a post-reich' event model[J].Journal of Navigation,2003,56(3):399-409.
  • 5Anderson D,Lin X G.Collision risk model for a crossing track separation methodology[J].Journal of Navigation,1996,49(2):337-349.
  • 6Shepherd R,Cassell R,Thapa R,et al.A reduced aircraft separation risk assessment model.[EB/J],[2010.4.11].http://www.airscene,com/white_papers/A% 20REDUCED% 20AIRCRAFT% 20SEPARATION%20RISK.pdf.
  • 7Bakker G J,Henk A P.Blom.air traffic collision risk modeling[C]// Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Decidon and Control.Texas,December,1993:1464-1469.
  • 8王欣,徐肖豪.空中飞机侧向间隔标准的初步研究[J].中国民航学院学报,2001,19(1):1-5. 被引量:26

共引文献25

同被引文献12

  • 1刘兰,杨恒.RVSM的简明介绍[J].技术与管理论坛,2006(3):16-17. 被引量:1
  • 2潘磊.关于RVSM[J].民航经济与技术,1997(5):52-53. 被引量:1
  • 3Es. A Review of Civil Aviation Accidents Air Traffic Management Related Accidents: 1980-1999[ C]. New-Mexico: The 4th International Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar, 2001.
  • 4P G Reich. Analysis of Long-Range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards Ⅰ [J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966,19(1) : 88-98.
  • 5P G Reich. Analysis of Long-Range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards Ⅱ [J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966,19(2) : 169-186.
  • 6P G Reich. Analysis of Long-Range Air Traffic Systems: Separation Standards Ⅲ [J]. Journal of Navigation, 1966,19(3) : 331-347.
  • 7Peter Brooker. Lateral Collision Risk in Air Traffic Systems: A Post-Reich Event Model[ J]. Journal Of Navigation, 2003,56 ( 3 ) : 399-409.
  • 8D A Hsu. The Evaluation of Aircraft Collision Probabilities at In- tersecting Air Routes[J]. Journal of Navigation, 1981,34( 1 ) :78 -102.
  • 9G Moek, E Lutz, W Mosberg. Risk Assessment of RNP10 and RVSM In the South Atlantic Flight Identification Regions [ R ]. ARINC, 2001.
  • 10徐肖豪,李冬宾,李雄,张秀辉.基于EVENT模型的垂直间隔碰撞风险研究[J].中国民航大学学报,2008,26(4):1-5. 被引量:15

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部