期刊文献+

网络服务提供者侵权归责原则新论 被引量:8

On the Imputing Principle of Internet Service Provider's Infringement
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,随着网络侵权案件的层出不穷,网络服务提供者在网络侵权中的法律责任备受关注,而其前提是合理地确定网络服务提供者侵权归责原则,本文通过分析网络侵权行为特殊性,评述我国的立法现状,提出根据网络服务提供者的不同分类及不同侵权行为来合理确定网络服务提供者的侵权归责原则,构建以过错责任原则为主,无过错责任原则和公平责任原则为辅的归责原则体系,有效的平衡各网络主体之间的利益冲突,促进网络社会和谐美好的发展。 In recent years,with more and more network infringement cases happening,the network service providers in the network tort liability are concerned,and its premise identifies reasonably the infringement liability principle of network service providers.This paper,through analyzing the special nature of network infringement,reviews our current status of legislation and proposes to determine reasonably the infringement liability principle of network service providers according to the network service providers in different categories and different violations,so as to set up the main principle of fault liability,and the auxiliary principle of no-fault liability and the equitable liability in the imputation system.Balance should be achieved effectively in the main conflicts of interest between the various networks,in order to to promote harmonious development of the network society.
作者 喻磊 谢绍浬
出处 《江西科技师范学院学报》 2010年第4期1-4,共4页 Journal of Nanchang Vocational & Technical Techers' College
关键词 网络服务提供者 侵权责任 归责原则 Internet service providers tortious responsibility imputation principles
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1兰晓为.网络著作权侵权主体——“网络服务提供者”之解读[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2009,8(4):48-51. 被引量:7
  • 2王利明.侵权行为法研究[M].中国人民大学出版社,2004,.
  • 3赵封.网络服务提供者侵权责任研究[D].硕士学位论文.中国优秀硕士论文全文数据库.西南财经大学,2007.
  • 4陶鑫良.新媒体时代知识产权保护若于问题探讨[EB/OL].(2005-06-06)[2009-1l-05]http://yule.sohu.com/20050606/n225838611.shtml.
  • 5张烨.也谈“人肉搜索”法律问题.信息化法规速递,2008,(9):48-50.
  • 6程茂军.网络服务商侵权责任归责原则研究[D].硕士学位论文.中国优秀硕士论文全文数据库.山东大学.2006.

二级参考文献14

  • 1GARNER B A. Black's law dictionary[M]. 8th ed. Eagan: West Group, 2004.
  • 2NORRIS A M. American copyright issues in the pre- Grokster landscape: an introduction to the Spring 2005 New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy Symposium[J]. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Polley, 2005,9( 1 ) :2 - 5.
  • 3SKELTON T. Internet copyright infringement and service providers: the case for a negotiated rulemaking alternative [J]. San Diego Law Review, 1998(35) :222.
  • 4BALLON I. Pinning the blame in cyberspace: towards a coherent theory for imposing vicarious copyright, trademark and tort liability for conduct occurring over the internet[J].Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal, 1996(18) :737.
  • 5PEGUERA M. I just know that I (actually) know nothing: actual knowledge and other problems in ISP liability case law in Spain[J ]. European Intellectual Property Review, 2008,30(7) :280 - 285.
  • 6Anon. The principles for user generated content services: a middle-ground approach to cyber-governance [ J ]. Harvard Law Review, 2008,121(5) :1398.
  • 7BROWN E D. Online copyright infringement presents some special issues [J ]. Journal of DuPage County Bar Association, 2008(21) :22.
  • 8SAWICKI A. Repeat infringement in the digital millennium copyright act[J]. University of Chicago Law Review, 2006 (73) : 1485.
  • 9DMCA, art 512 (k).
  • 10House Judiciary Committee Hearing on WIPO Treaty & Online Copyright Legislation, September, 1997, P. 89 (prepared statement of Roy Neel, on behalf of the US Telephone Association).

共引文献11

同被引文献83

引证文献8

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部