法官如何思考——法官意识形态的选择困境

Judicial Self-restraint or Judicial Activism——A Judge in the Selection Dilemma

司法克制主义与能动主义是法官在司法活动中必然面临的司法哲学模式。司法克制主义,由于它表现出的对法律规则及其意图的尊重,使法律有了相当大的可理解性和预期性,得到了广泛的尊崇;而司法能动主义表现出的最大限度地追求个案正义、弥补立法不足等优势也得到了众多支持者的垂青,于是这两种模式的激烈碰撞将法官带入了选择困境。在我国法治建设中,法官应秉持一种温和的能动主义的司法理念,以更好的实现法治,追求正义。

Judicial activism and restraint doctrine are the judicial activities of judges in the judicial philosophy model.Judicial restraint doctrine demonstrates the intention of the rule of law and respect,and the law has been considerably intelligible,predictable and widely respected Judicial activism is demonstrated by the pursuit of possible cases of justice,and has been under the attention of many supporters,so fierce collision of these two models traps judges.In our country,judges should uphold a mild judicial philosophy of activism to better the rule of law and pursue for justice.