人事诉讼判决既判力扩张与失权效之法理分析

Legal Analysis on the Intermediate Effectiveness Expansion of Domestic Proceedings Verdict and the Effect of Rights Loss

为了保护承受判决效第三人的合法权益,两大法系的一些国家都施行了检察官参与人事诉讼、限制适用辩论主义、实行职权探知等制度和法则。通过这些制度和法则的施行,不仅从程序上保障了裁判机关作出与实体真实一致的判决结果,同时从制度的层面为人事诉讼判决效力扩张的正当化奠定了基础。禁止重复起诉法理演绎出失权效的根据并非在于维系身份关系稳定之一般性要求,而应从前诉当事人证据提出责任以及由此推导出的当事人自我责任中去寻求。

In order to maintain the high degree of unity between identities and to realize the harmonious and stable social orders,many countries of civil law accept the domestic proceedings verdict effectiveness expansion and the effect of rights loss in legislative area.It’s an exception of verdict effectiveness principle that the verdict effectiveness can be used for the third party.In order to protect the legitimate interests of the third party who takes the verdict effectiveness,many countries implement public procurators participating in domestic proceedings,restricting of application of the debate,and implementing some special terms of law,such as finding out the purposes of authority.Through the implementation of these special terms of law,the verdict sentenced by judicial authorities can not only be guaranteed as true as the entity from the procedures,but also make the good foundation to justify the domestic proceedings verdict effectiveness expansion.