期刊文献+

Behavioral interactions between a coexisting rodent Micaelamys namaquensis and macroscelid Elephantulus myurus 被引量:1

Behavioral interactions between a coexisting rodent Micaelamys namaquensis and macroscelid Elephantulus myurus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 A number of mechanisms are known to influence coexistence in small mammal communities. However, the role ofbehavioral interactions in promoting species coexistence is under-represented in the literature. We studied the behavioral interactionsof two coexisting small mammals, the Namaqua rock mouse Micaelamys namaquensis (Rodentia) and the Rock sengi Elephantulusmyurus (Macroscelidae), which have high dietary and microhabitat overlap. Using wild-caught individuals, intra- andinterspecific dyadic encounters were staged in tanks on a neutral rocky outcrop. Interspecific dyads displayed significantly moreactive avoidance behavior. There was no support for the prediction that the larger, more specialist species, E. myurus, is behaviorallydominant over M. namaquensis. Intraspecific encounters of E. myurus showed significantly more passive avoidance andamicable behavior, whereas the behavior of M. namaquensis did not differ between intra- and inter-specific encounters, both ofwhich were characterized by low levels of aggression and amicability. Thus, due to the lack of aggression, direct competition appearsweak and instead mutual avoidance may reduce or minimize interspecific interactions, potentially promoting coexistence.
机构地区 School of Animal
出处 《Current Zoology》 SCIE CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第4期395-400,共6页 动物学报(英文版)
基金 provided by the National Research Foundation (Grant number:2069110) the University of the Witwatersrand
关键词 AVOIDANCE COEXISTENCE Elephantulus myurus Intraspecific behavior Interspecific behavior Micaelamys namaquensis 回避行为 物种共存 啮齿类动物 相互作用 小哺乳动物 动物群落 大肠杆菌 蒸发散
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Abramsky Z, Rosenzweig ML, Subach A, 2001. The cost of interspecific competition in two gerbils species. J. Anim. Ecol. 70: 561-567.
  • 2Brown JS, 1989. Desert rodent community structure: A test of four mechanisms of coexistence. Ecol. Monogr. 59: 1-20.
  • 3Cheney DL, Seyfarth RM, 1982. Recognition of individuals within and between groups of free-ranging vervet monkeys. Am. Zool. 22: 519-529.
  • 4Chesson P, 1986. Environmental variation and the coexistence of species. In: Diamond J, Case TJ ed. Community Ecology. New York: Harper and Row.
  • 5Conley W, 1976. Competition between Microtus: A behavioural hypothesis. Ecol. 57: 224-237.
  • 6Cranford JA, Derting TL, 1983. Intra- and interspecific behaviour of Microtus pennsylvanicus and Microtus pinetorum. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 13: 7-11.
  • 7Douglass RJ, 1976. Spatial interactions and microhabitat selections of two locally sympatric voles Microtus montanus and Microtus pennsylvanicus. Ecol. 57: 346-352.
  • 8Drickamer LC, 2001. Urine marking and social dominance in male house mice Mus musculus domesticus. Behav. Proc. 53: 113-120.
  • 9Ferreira SM, Van Aarde RJ, 1999. Habitat associations and competition in Mastomys-Saccostomus-Aethomys assemblages on coastal dune forests. Afr. J. Ecol. 37: 121-136.
  • 10Garcia JT, Arroyo BE, 2002. Intra- and interspecific agonistic behaviour in sympatric harriers during the breeding season. Anim. Behav. 64: 77-84.

引证文献1

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部