摘要
界定"淫秽"应以社会法益为基准进行事实考察;不能以国家法益或个人法益为基准,对"假想侵害"进行救济。从"质"的规定性看,"淫秽"需要根据社会一般人观念进行价值判断,不能以法官或行为人的价值观为依据;"淫秽"具有时间上的可变性、空间上的趋同性和规范语境上的差异性。从"量"的规定性看,应"从树看林",将淫秽性与其他价值属性(不限于文艺性、科学性)进行比较衡量;不能"从林看树",仅仅进行粗糙的整体考察。
To define "pornographic",the fact-finding mission should be carried through based on social legal interest,and a "hypothetic infraction" judged by national or personal legal interest should not be relieved.On the point of "quality","pornographic" should be judged by the values of the general,not of the judge or the actor. "Pornographic" has temporal variability,spatial convergent tendence and different concept in different norms.On the point of "quantity",the judge should "see the forest from the trees",not "see the tree from the forest",and should compare "pornographic" with other values of attributes (not limited to literary,scientific),not just a rough overall investigation.
出处
《韶关学院学报》
2010年第7期18-21,共4页
Journal of Shaoguan University
关键词
刑法
淫秽
事实考察
价值判断
价值比较
pornograpic
fact judgment
value judgment
comparison of values