期刊文献+

转喻—隐喻连续体在名词动用的类型表现及影响 被引量:2

Types of the Continuum in Denominal Verbs and Their Impacts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 转喻和隐喻机制共同作用于名词动用现象,两者相互作用构成连续体关系。这里讨论了转喻—隐喻连续体的基本类型,认为连续体作用于名词动用主要体现为来自转喻的隐喻和隐喻内的转喻两种类型,并且宏观上对该现象在构词与修辞、搭配特征、词汇来源、区别性特征等四个方面产生影响,使之有别于省略等现象。 Metonymy and metaphor, which form a continuum, are considered as two interacting mechanisms working on denominal verbs. This paper has analysed the types of their interactions in modern English and Chinese denominal verbs, and has discussed their impacts on the characteristics of denominal verbs. Such impacts are globally reflected in four aspects:(1)word formation vs. rhetoric;(2)collocation;(3)lexical resources;(4)denominal verb vs. ellipsis.
作者 王薇 寮菲
出处 《浙江工业大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第3期330-335,348,共7页 Journal of Zhejiang University of Technology:Social Sciences
基金 浙江省社会科学界联合会研究课题(2009N10)
关键词 转喻 隐喻 连续体 名词动用 metonymy metaphor continuum denominal verb
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘正光.名词动用过程中的隐喻思维[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):335-339. 被引量:113
  • 2刘正光,周红民.惯用语理解的认知研究[J].外语学刊,2002(2):7-14. 被引量:45
  • 3刘正光.莱柯夫隐喻理论中的缺陷[J].外语与外语教学,2001(1):25-29. 被引量:54
  • 4Eco, U. The semantics of metaphor[A]. In Innis,R E (ed.) 1985.
  • 5Gibbs, R. The Poetics of the Mind[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
  • 6Jakobson, R. Closing statements: Linguistics and Poetics[A]. In Innis, R E (ed.) 1985.
  • 7Innis, R E Semiotics, an Introductory Anthology[C]. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1985.
  • 8Lakoff, G & Johnon, M Metaphors We Liveby[M]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 9Lakoff, G & M Turner. More Than Cool Reason: a Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor[M].Chicago: The University of Chicago Press,1989.
  • 10Langacker, R. Concept, Image and Symbol: the Cognitive Basis of Grammar[M]. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 1999.

共引文献285

同被引文献17

  • 1刘正光.名词动用过程中的隐喻思维[J].外语教学与研究,2000,32(5):335-339. 被引量:113
  • 2徐盛桓.名动转用的语义基础[J].外国语,2001,24(1):15-23. 被引量:130
  • 3Dirven R. Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of event schemata[A]. In K. Panther &G. Radden (eds.). Metonymy in Language and Thought [C]. Amsterdam and Philadel- phia: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 1999: 275--287.
  • 4Lakoff O. Women, Fire, and Danger- ous Things. What Categories Reveal about the Mind [ M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987. 288.
  • 5Goossens L. Metaphtonymy: The inter- action of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action [J ]. Cognitive Linguistics, 1990 ,(1): 323--340.
  • 6Quirk, R. , S. Greenbaum, G. Leech &J. Svartvik. AGrammar of Contemporary English [M]. London: LongmanGroup Ltd. , 1972.
  • 7Clark, E. V. & H. H. Clark. When nouns surface as verbs[J]. Language, 1979(4).
  • 8Dirven, R. Conversion as a conceptual metonymy of eventschemata [M] / / K. Panther&G. Radden. MetonymyinLan-guageandThought. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John BenjaminsPublishing Company, 1999.
  • 9Taylor, J. R. Category extension by metonymy and metaphor[M] / / Ren佴Dirven&Ralf Prings . Metaphor and Metonymyin Comparison and Contrast. Berlin and New York: Moutonde Gruyter, 2002.
  • 10张媛.英语人体器官名词动用的语法转喻阐释[J].山东外语教学,2010(3):107-112. 被引量:12

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部