基于集群治理的产业集群内企业知识资产保护模式研究被引量：9

Research on intellectual property protection modes in cluster:based on cluster governance theory

导出

摘要产业集群内成员企业由于其邻近性和快速知识溢出,导致相互之间技术很容易模仿,而现有知识产权法律难以有效地保护集群企业的知识资产,这种现象已对集群企业产生创新负激励。从集群治理视角研究如何保护集群内企业知识资产的有效模式,在分析集群知识资产保护案例的基础上,提出从治理主体是否具有权威和治理主体与其他个体网络关系类型两个维度划分集群企业知识资产的保护模式,并分析了与之对应的集群中知识资产保护模式和机制。 It is easy for firms imitate mutually within the industrial cluster,because of its proximity and knowledge spill-over.Laws cannot protect the intellectual property（IP） of the firms effectively.This article analysis how to protect IP of the firms in cluster based on governance theory.After introduction three cases about IP protection in cluster,we use authority and the relationship type of network as two dimensions to divided governance modes,analyze the corresponding IPP modes and protection mechanisms in cluster.

作者魏江孔小磊周泯非李红

机构地区浙江大学管理学院

出处《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期1354-1360,共7页 Studies in Science of Science

基金国家自然科学基金资助项目(70773099) 国家社会科学规划重大项目(07&ZD022)

关键词产业集群集群治理知识资产保护 industrial cluster cluster governance IP protection

分类号 C93 [经济管理—管理学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献28

1Boschma R. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment[J]. Regional Studies, 2005, 39:61 -74.
2Mazzoleni R, Nelson, R R. The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debate[J]. Research Policy, 1998, 27(3) : 273 -284.
3Dixit A. Governance institutions and economic activity [ J]. American Economic Review, 2009, 99 ( 1 ) : 5 - 24.
4Edvinsson L, Sullivan P. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital [ J ]. European Management Journal, 1996, 14(4): 356-364.
5Romer P M. Endogenous technological change[J]. The Journal of Political Economy, 1990, 98 (5) : S71 - S102.
6Peteraf M A. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view [ J ]. Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(3): 179-191.
7Marco C. Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance[ J]. Strategic Management Journal, 2009, 30 (1): 81 -98.
8Arundel A, van de Paal G, Soete, L. Innovation strategies of Europe's largest industrial firms (PACE Report) [ R ]. MERIT, University of Limbourg, Maastricht, 1995.
9Cohen W M, Goto A, Nagata A, Nelson R R, Walsh J P. R&D spillovers, patents and the incentives to inno- vate in Japan and the United States[ J]. Research Policy, 2002, 31(8-9): 1349-1367.
10Levin R C. A new look at the patent system[ J]. The American economic review, 1986, 76(2) : 199 -202.

二级参考文献20

1Jessop B. The rise of governance and the risks of failure : the case of economic development [ J]. International Social Science Journal, 1998, 50 ( 155 ) : 29 - 45.
2Enright M J. Survey on the characterization of regional clusters : initial results [ R ]. Hong Kong : Institute of Economic Policy and Business Strategy, University of Hong Kong, 2000.
3Brown R. Cluster dynamics in rheory and practice with application to scotland[ R]. Glasgow : European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) , 2000.
4de Langen P. Governance in seaport clusters[J]. Maritime Economics and Logistics, 2004, 6:141 - 156.
5Visser E -J, Langen P d. The importance and quality of governance in the Chilean wine industry [ J]. GeoJournal, 2006, 65: 177- 197.
6Sugden R, Wei P, Wilson J R. Clusters, governance and the development of local economies: a framework for case studies[ A ]. Sugden R. Clusters and Globalisation: The Development of Urban and Regional Economies [C]. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. 2006. 61-$1.
7De Propris L, Wei P. Governance and competitiveness in the Birmingham Jewellery District [ J]. Urban Studies, 2007, 44(12): 2465-2486.
8Bradach J L, Eccles R G. Price, authority, and Trust: from ideal types to plural forms[J]. Annual Reviews in Sociology, 1989, 15(1) : 97 - 118.
9Dei Ottati G. Exit, voice and the evolution of industrial districts: the case of the post - World War Ⅱ economic development of Prato [ J ]. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2003, 27(4): 501 -522.
10Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts [ J ]. Economic Geography, 1996, 72(3) : 293 -313.