物权行为客观存在论——基于《物权法》第15条之思考

The Objective Existence of Juristic Act of Real Right:Taking the Fifth Piece of the "Property Law" as an Example

《物权法》的实施以立法的形式肯认了物权变动的区分原则,但其文本未采纳物权行为理论。债权合意使当事人负担特定给付义务,物权合意产生物权变动的效果;物权行为与债权行为同是法律行为的下位概念。当推演构筑完整民法体系的时候,绕不开对物权行为的判断、肯定和运用;《物权法》是否承认物权行为理论是立法者可为的选择,这并不妨碍物权行为是逻辑上的应然存在。

The implementation of the property law recognizes the discrimination rule in real right alternation,while fails to adopt the theory of juristic act of real right.The agreement of debt pays parties specific obligations,and the agreement of real right makes an effect of real right alternation.When constructing the entire system of civil law,people should rely on the judgment,affirmation and use of the juristic act of real right.It is an option for lawmakers to adopt the theory system of juristic act of real right or not,while this does not preclude that juristic act of real right is logically existence.