期刊文献+

舰艇动力装置应急维修作业复杂性量化研究 被引量:2

Research on the Quantification of Emergency Maintenance Task Complexity for Marine Power Facility
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于软件工程中程序复杂性量化的熵值法,提出了适应舰船动力装置应急维修作业复杂性评估的量化方法MTC.针对舰船动力装置,在分析影响维修作业复杂性主要因素的基础上,建立了维修作业的图熵模型,运用熵值法分别量化各影响因素的复杂性,应用MTC法得出维修作业复杂性的量值.应用MTC法对蒸汽给水系统支路管道裂纹抢修过程复杂性进行量化分析,并对MTC法的有效性进行了验证.结果表明,MTC法的量值与维修时间具有相同的变化趋势,量值可较准确表征维修作业的复杂性程度. MTC(Maintenance Task Complexity)method to quantify complexity of the emergency maintenance task for nuclear power system is developed based on entropy measures that have been used in software engineering.Analyzing the key factors to influence the maintenance task complexity,build-ing the model of maintenance task,the complexity of every factor is quantified by MTC method.As a result,the quantification values of task complexity including of three subfactors are obtained.To verify the suitableness of MTC method,in the case of branch pipe of coolant purification system,the complexity of emergency maintenance tasks for crack are analyzed and quantified.From these results,it was observed that the change tendency of MTC measure value agrees with that of task performance time obtained from empirical data and history records.Thus,it could be concluded that the MTC measure value would factually show the complexity of maintenance task.
出处 《武汉理工大学学报(交通科学与工程版)》 2010年第4期813-817,共5页 Journal of Wuhan University of Technology(Transportation Science & Engineering)
关键词 动力装置 应急维修 作业复杂性 marine power facility emergency maintenance task complexity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1许以全,车济尧,苏云,曹学武.秦山一期核电站小破口冷却剂丧失初因严重事故以及缓解措施的研究[J].核动力工程,2004,25(6):546-549. 被引量:4
  • 2Park J,Jung W.A study on the development of a task complexity measure for emergency operating procedures of nuclear power plants[J].Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2006,92:1102-1116.
  • 3Park J,Jung W,Ha J,et al.The step complexity measure for emergency operating procedures:measure verification[J].Reliab Eng Syst Saf,2002,76:45-59.
  • 4Zahedi F.The analytic hierarchy process:a survey of the method and its application[J].Interface,1986,16:96-108.

二级参考文献7

  • 1[1]NUREG-1150. Severe Accident Risks: An Assessment for Five U.S. Nuclear Power Plants[S]. USNRC, 1990.
  • 2[2]Southern California Edison. Individual Plant Examination Report for SAN ONOFRE Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 in Response to Generic[R]. 1993,Letter 88 ~ 20.
  • 3[5]NUREG/CR-6150. SCDAP/RELAP5/MOD3.2 CODE MANUAL[S]. The SCDAP/RELAP5 DevelopmentTeam, 1997.
  • 4[7]IAEA-TCR-00959. Report of the Ramp Mission to the Krsko Nuclear Power Plant [R]. 2001.
  • 5[8]NEA/CSNI/R(96)18. Catalogue of Generic Plant States Leading to Core Melt in PWRs[R]. OECD NEA, 1996.
  • 6曹学武 苏云 杨燕华.国外严重事故管理现状以及对我国开展严重事故管理的建议[J].核安全,2002,3:37-42.
  • 7许以全,苏云,曹学武.秦山一期核电站SGTR导致堆芯熔化进程及事故缓解措施的研究[J].核动力工程,2004,25(3):279-283. 被引量:8

共引文献3

同被引文献10

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部