期刊文献+

空腹血糖及OGTT1h血糖对糖尿病诊断意义的比较 被引量:1

The comparison of fasting plasma glucose and 1-hour plasma glucose to diagnose diabetes mellitus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较空腹血糖(FPG)及口服糖耐量试验(OGTT)1h血糖(PG)诊断糖尿病灵敏度和特异度的差异及其与胰岛B细胞功能及胰岛素抵抗的关系。方法:选取需行OGTT的4 430名受试者。用接受者工作特征(ROC)曲线计算出OGTT1hPG诊断糖尿病的最佳切点,后将其与FPG进行比较分析。结果:以糖尿病为参考标准,ROC曲线得出OGTT1hPG诊断糖尿病的最佳切点为12.94 mmol/L。以OGTT2hPG≥11.1 mmol/L为诊断糖尿病的金标准,FPG≥7.0mmol/L诊断糖尿病的灵敏度为62.91%,特异度为96.46%;OGTT1hPG≥12.94 mmol/L诊断糖尿病的灵敏度为83.62%,特异度为88.42%。FPG和1hPG与胰岛素抵抗指数(HOMA-IR)呈正相关(P<0.01);与HOMA-B呈负相关(P<0.01);与胰岛素生成指数呈负相关(P<0.01)。结论:单纯用FPG诊断糖尿病漏诊率高,1hPG更有诊断价值,且FPG和1hPG可一定程度反映胰岛B细胞功能及胰岛素抵抗情况。 Objective: To compare the sensitivity and specificity of fasting plasma glucose(FPG) and 1- hour plasma glucose ( lhPG)to diagnose diabetes mellitus (DM), and the relation of them with islet B cell function and insulin resistance. Methods: 4 430 objects who need an OGTI' were recruited. The optimal cutoff value of I hPG was calculated by ROC curve , and compared with FPG. Results: According to ROC results, to diagnose type 2 DM, the optimal cutoff value of lh PG was 12.94 mmol/L. Classifying OGqT 2hPG ≥11.1 mmol/L as gold standard of diagnosing diabetes mellitus, the sensitivity of FPG ≥7.0mmol/L to diagnose DM was 62.91%,the specificity was 94,46%; the sensitivity of lhPG I〉 12.94 mmol/L to diagnose DM was 83.62% ,the specificity was 88.42%. There was a negative correlation between FPG, lhPG and insulingenie index, HOMA-B (P〈0.01) and a positive correlation between lhPG and HOMA-IR (P〈0.01). Conclusion: By FPG alone, there is high rate of missed diagnosis of DM, lhPG have more diagnostic value, and they all can reflect islet B cell function and insulin resistance in some extent.
作者 刘乐 冯凭
出处 《天津医科大学学报》 2010年第3期470-472,共3页 Journal of Tianjin Medical University
关键词 空腹血糖 口服葡萄糖耐量试验 胰岛B细胞功能 胰岛素抵抗 Fasting plasma glucose Oral glucose tolerance test Islet B cell function Insulin resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1DECODE Study Group.Will new diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus change phenotype of patients with diabetes? Reanalysis of European epidemiologieal data[J]. BMJ, 1995,317(8) : 371.
  • 2Pyrla K. Relationship of glucose tolerance and plasma insulin to the incidence of coronary heart disease: results from two population studies in Finland[J]. Diabetes Care,1979,2(2): 131.
  • 3Gapstur SM, Gann PH, Colangelo LA, et al. Postload plasma glucose concentration and 27-year prostate cancer mortality [J]. Cancer Causes Control, 2001,12(8):763.
  • 4Zhou WB , Gu Y, Li H, et al. Assessing 1 -h plasma glucose and shape of the glucose curve during oral glucose tolerance test[J]. Eur J Endocrinol, 2006, 155(1): 191.
  • 5Abdul-Ghani MA, Williams K, DeFronzo RA, et al. What is the best predictor of future type 2 diabetes [J]. Diabetes Care ,2007,30(6): 1544.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部