期刊文献+

核电站人员可靠性分析方法THERP中的班组因素 被引量:5

Team factors in THERP of human reliability analyses for nuclear power plants
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前核电站概率安全评价(PSA)中的人员可靠性分析(HRA)着重于个人行为特征,没有充分涵盖班组特点。该文以Sasou和Reason提出的班组失误分类方法为理论基础,分析人误概率预测技术(THERP)中班组因素构模方法。结论如下:THERP方法在诊断模型等方面已考虑了班组因素,但在模化班组导致的正/负相关性问题、相关性影响传递范围、相关性程度量化关系式等存在不足。保持THERP总体框架不变,引入故障树等方法对诱误因素进行处理,以及利用计算机模拟技术建立班组失误模型对相应环节的人误概率进行修正等,可提高THERP对班组失误的构模能力。 Human reliability analyses(HRA) in probabilistic safety assessments(PSA) of nuclear power plants concentrate on individual behavior and do not adequately reflect team characteristics.Team errors' taxonomy theory was used to analyze the team factors model for human error rate prediction.Some of the team-related factors are considered in the model,with some emissions,especially the modeling of positive/negative dependence caused by the team,the propagation of dependent effects and dependence quantification correlations.The team errors modeling can be improved by processing dependent errors caused by incorrect/absent information through the fault tree technique and building team models using computer simulations to update human error rates.
出处 《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期1425-1428,共4页 Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70771054)
关键词 概率安全评价(PSA) 人员可靠性分析(HRA) 班组 人员失误概率预测技术 probabilistic safety assessments(PSA) human reliability analysis(HRA) team technique for human error rate prediction
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Swain A, Guttmann H. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications [R]. NUREG/CR 1278, Washington DC: United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 2Chang Y, Mosleh A. Cognitive modeling and dynamic probabilistic simulation of operating crew response to complex system accidents: Part 1 -4 [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2007, 92(2): 997 1075.
  • 3Sasou K, Reason J. Team errors: Definition and taxonomy [J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 1999, 65(1): 1-9.
  • 4吕人力,周艳,周沐.空中交通管制团队人误的分类及致因研究[J].中国安全科学学报,2009,19(1):64-70. 被引量:12
  • 5Milici A, Mulvihill R, Guarro S. Extending the Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology (DFM) to Model Human Performance and Team Effect [R]. NUREG/CR-6710, Washington DC : United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2001.

二级参考文献11

共引文献11

同被引文献29

  • 1马莉娜,罗渝川.基于CREAM模型的法航447事故分析[J].电子技术(上海),2020(6):86-87. 被引量:1
  • 2黄曙东,戴立操,张力.核电厂人因可靠性量化分析与应用[J].工业工程与管理,2006,11(2):48-51. 被引量:4
  • 3孙志强,谢红卫,李欣欣,史秀建.CREAM方法中控制模式分类的模糊方法[J].中国安全科学学报,2007,17(5):21-26. 被引量:12
  • 4Zio E.Reliability engineering:Old problems and new challenges.Reliability Engineering&.System Safety[J].2009,94:125-141.
  • 5Milici A,Mulvihill R,Guarro S.Extending the Dynamic Flowgraph Methodology(DFM)to model human performance and team effect[R].NUREG REPORT NUREG/CR6710,USNRC,2001.
  • 6S.E Cooper,A.Ramey-Smith,J.Wreathall et al.A Technique for Human Event Analysis[R].NUREG report NUREG/CR-6350,USNRC,1996.
  • 7Swain A D,Guttmann H E.Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant application.NUREG/CR-1278,Washington,DC:US NRC,1983.
  • 8Dougherty E. Context and human reliability analysis[J]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 1993, 41(1): 25-47.
  • 9Swain A D, Guttmann H E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications (NUREG/CR-1278) [R]. Washington D C: US Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1983.
  • 10Forester J, Kolaczkowski A, Cooper S E. ATHEANA user's guide[R]. U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington DC, 2007.

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部