期刊文献+

遗传毒性标准试验组合结果分析的最新进展 被引量:6

Progress in analysis of findings in the standard battery of genotoxicity tests
原文传递
导出
摘要 遗传毒性评价研究在药物研发中起着非常重要的作用,但是遗传毒性试验的假阳性和/或假阴性结果会干扰对候选药物利弊权衡的决策,因此对体外、体内遗传毒性试验结果进行正确的综合分析尤为重要。本文就遗传毒性标准试验组合中影响结果分析评价的若干争议热点,如体外哺乳动物细胞试验的高阳性率、代谢因素、体内微核试验的影响因素等研究进展进行综述,概括结果分析和追加试验流程图,并对遗传毒性标准试验组合的完善提出一些展望,为遗传毒理指导原则的修订完善和遗传毒性评价工作的深入开展提供指导线索。 Genotoxicity research plays an important role in new drug development,but the false positive and/or false negative results of genotoxicity tests may interfere weighing the risks of candidate drugs and making decisions.Thus it is particularly important to give comprehensive and sound analysis of these in vitro and in vivo findings.In this review,we summarized the major research progress about some controversial hot spots that influence the analysis and evaluation of the findings in the standard battery of genotoxicity tests,such as the high rate of positive results in in vitro mammalian cell tests,metabolic considerations,the influence factors about in vivo micronucleus studies and so on.The recommendation frameworks for interpretation of standard battery and follow-up test were also included.Finally the prospect of some improvements to the standard battery of genotoxicity tests was put forward.These may provide some key clues for the revision of existing guidelines for genotoxicity and the development of genetic toxicity assessment work.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第17期1512-1516,共5页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
基金 上海科委专业技术服务能力建设基金资助项目(09DZ2290900)
关键词 遗传毒性 标准试验组合 结果分析 genotoxicity the standard battery of tests analysis of findings
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1KIRKLAND D, AARDEMA M, HENDERSON L, et al. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens. I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity[ J]. Murat Res, 2005, 584(1/2) : 1 -256.
  • 2BLAKEY D, GALLOWAY SM, KIRKLAND DJ, et al. Regulatory aspects of genotoxicity testing: from hazard identification to risk assessment[ Jl. Murat Res, 2008, 657 ( 1 ) : 84 - 90.
  • 3WHITE PA, DOUGLAS GD, GINGERICH J, et al. Development and characterization of a stable epithelial cell line from Muta^TM Mouse lung [J]. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2003, 42 ( 3 ) : 166 - 184.
  • 4CURREN RD, MUN GC, GIBSON DP, et al. Development of a method for assessing micronucleus induction in a 3D human skin model (EpiDerm^TM ) [J]. Murat Res, 2006, 607 ( 2 ) : 192 - 204.
  • 5KIRKLAND D, PFUHLER S, TWEATS D, et al. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop[J]. Mutat Res, 2007, 628(1): 31 -55.
  • 6THYBAUD V, AARDEMA M, CASCIANO D, et al. Relevance and follow-up of positive results in in vitro genetic toxicity assays : An ILSI-HESI initiative[ J]. Mutat Res, 2007, 633 (2) : 67 - 79.
  • 7THYBAUD V, AARDEMAB M, CLEMENTS J, et al. Strategy for genotoxicity testing: Hazard identification and risk assessment in relation to in vitro testing[J]. Mutat Res, 2007, 627( 1 ) : 41 -58.
  • 8KIRKLAND D, SPEIT G. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens III. Appropriate follow-up testing in vivo [J]. Mutat Res, 2008, 654(2): 114 -132.
  • 9HILLIARD C, HILL R, ARMSTRONG M, et al. Chromosome aberrations in Chinese hamster and human cells: A comparison using compounds with various genotoxicity profiles [J]. Mutat Res, 2007, 616(1 -2) : 103 - ll8.
  • 10KU WW, BIGGER A, BRAMBILLA G, et al. Strategy for genotoxicity testing-Metabolic considerations [ J ]. Murat Res, 2007, 627(1): 59-77.

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部