期刊文献+

上市公司高管股权激励所得税规定与激励效用冲突分析 被引量:20

The Conflicts between Income Tax Regulations of Executive Equity Incentives and Incentive Effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章通过对比分析中美两国公司高管股权激励所得税制度差异,发现中国的所得税规定与股权激励制度的激励效果存在冲突,主要表现为:按工资薪金所得纳税,其超额累进税制导致的高边际税率会影响股权激励效用的发挥;在行权日纳税,过重的税收负担会削弱高管实施股权激励制度的积极性,或迫使高管立即抛售股票来缴税,还容易引发高管的机会主义行为;在行权日纳税还导致股权激励收益与税基不匹配。文章针对我国股权激励税收制度中存在的问题提出相应的建议,以期为进一步完善我国上市公司股权激励税收制度提供参考。 The realization of the expected aim of equity incentive system is closely related to national tax policies. Through the comparative analysis of income tax regulations of executive equity incentives in China and USA, the paper arrives at the conclusion that there are conflicts between income tax system and equity incentive effect in China. The main conflicts are as follows: firstly, the high marginal tax rate caused by progressive tax system according to the tax category of wages and salaries will curb the equity incentive effect; secondly, paying tax on exercise day will increase executives' tax burden, leading to their lack of enthusiasm for implementing equity incentive system or instant selling of the exercised stock to collect money for tax-paying, and the opportunistic behavior of executives will be apt to occur; thirdly, the returns of equity incentives do not match the tax base if tax is paid on exercise day. The paper provides some suggestions about the further perfection of tax regulations of equity incentives in China.
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第9期37-47,共11页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(70872022 70632002) 教育部人文社会科学规划基金资助项目(06JA630016) 上海市哲学社会科学基金资助项目(2008BJB021)
关键词 股权激励 税收安排 利益冲突 equity incentive tax arrangement interest conflict
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献28

  • 1周建波.《公司特质、经营者持股与经营绩效》论文打印稿[M].,2002..
  • 2Core,John E., Robert W. Holthausen, David F. larcker, 1999, Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance, Journal of Financial Economics.
  • 3Engel Ellen, Elizabeth A. Gordon, and Rachel M. Hayes , 2002 , The Roles of Performance Measures and Monitoring in Annual Governance Decisions in Entrepreneurial Finns.
  • 4Morck, R., Andrei Sldeifer, and Robert W. Vishny, 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis", Journal of Financial Economics.
  • 5Murphy, K.J., 1985, Corporate Performance and Managerial Remuneration:An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics.
  • 6林毅夫.《关于制度变迁的经济学理论:诱致性变迁与强制性变迁》[A]..《财产权利与制度变迁:产权学派与新制度学派文集》[C].上海:上海人民出版社,1994..
  • 7Arnold ,M. & Gillenkrich ,R .2002. stock option as incentive contracts and dividend policy [DB/OL] .http://papers.ssm.com/so 13/papers.cfm?abstract_id303242.
  • 8Bebchuk,L.Fried,J & Walker, D .2002. Managerial Power and Rent Extration in the Design of Executive Compensation[J] . University of Chicago Law Review. vol69:751-846.
  • 9Bergstresser,D&Philippon,T.2006,CEO incentives and earnings management [J] . Journal of Financial Economics. 80(2006) :511-529.
  • 10Balsam,s & Chen,H.2003.Earings management prior to stock option grants [DB/OL] .http://papers.ssrn.com/so 13/papers.cfm?abstractid378440.

共引文献411

同被引文献155

引证文献20

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部