政治权威与道德自主性:悖论及协调的可能性——对沃尔夫哲学无政府主义论证思路的一种反思

Paradox and Possibility of Coordination between Political Authority and Moral Autonomy:A Reflection on Wolff's Philosophical Anarchy Argumentation

沃尔夫式的哲学无政府主义的理论诉求在于表明一切国家权威的存在都是与人的自主性相违背的,因此都是不合法的,这就是权威与自主性的悖论。法兰克福自主性进路的论述与精致的概念分析相比也存在问题。康德意义上的自主性具有个体的和集体的两个维度,康德在政治理论中更强调自主性的集体性层面。沃尔夫推导其哲学无政府主义观点的主要前提性问题在于对康德自主性概念的片面使用,即主要基于个体性层面。经由必要的理论建构与概念界定,权威与自主性是能够得到协调的,而且这也是政治哲学的中心任务。

Wolff＇s philosophical anarchy tried to prove that all state authorities are in conflict with human autonomy and illegal,and this is the paradox of political authority and moral autonomy.The approach of autonomy by Frankfurt is also far from explicit concept analysis.Kantian autonomy bears the dimension of individual and collective,and the latter is more emphasized in Kant＇s political theory.Through necessary theoretical construction and definition,it is possible to coordinate between authority and autonomy,and this is the core task of political philosophy.