期刊文献+

以利益为基础的权利本位观——拉兹的权利概念分析 被引量:15

The Rights-Based Conception On the Ground of Interests:Analysis of Raz's Concept of Rights
原文传递
导出
摘要 拉兹是当代权利利益论的最杰出代表。围绕权利的概念,拉兹提出了自己的命题,分析了权利的利益基础以及权利和义务之间的关系,推进了霍菲尔德以来权利理论的发展。认真检视拉兹的权利概念及对它的批判,有助于澄清学者们对拉兹的普遍误解,更好地理解拉兹,把握权利概念的内涵。 Raz is the most prominent scholar of rights'interest theory today.He has proposed his own definition of rights,analyzing the base of rights and the relationship of rights and duties,and having promoted the development of theories of rights since Hohfeld.Critical examinations of Raz's conception of rights and its critics,not only help clarifying the debate over Raz's definition,understanding Raz better,but also help grasping the meanings of rights correctly on contemporary time.
作者 严海良
出处 《法制与社会发展》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期137-148,共12页 Law and Social Development
关键词 权利 利益 义务 right interest duty
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1J. E. Penner. The Analysis of Rights [J]. Ratio Juris, 1997, (10).
  • 2N. E. Simmonds. Central Issues in Jurisprudence: Justice, Law and Rights [ M ]. London: Sweet & Maxwell Limited, 2002.
  • 3Joseph Raz. Legal Rights [J]. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1984, (4).
  • 4Joseph Raz. The Morality of Freedom [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1986.
  • 5Andrei Marmor. On the Limits of Rights [J]. Law and Philosophy, 1997, (16).
  • 6[美]庞德 沈宗灵 译.通过法律的社会控制·法律的任务[M].北京:商务印书馆,1984.67.
  • 7Hart. Essays On Bentham: Studies in Jurisprudence and Political Theory [ M ]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1982.
  • 8Tom Campbell. Rights: A Critical Introduction [M]. New York: Routledge, 2006.
  • 9William A. Edmundson. An Introduction to Rights [ M]. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
  • 10F. M. Kamm. Rights [ A]. Jules Coleman, Scottshapiro. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence & Philosophy of Law [ C]. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.

共引文献18

同被引文献260

引证文献15

二级引证文献196

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部