评日本的“早期马克思论争”——兼论《穆勒评注》对重构马克思异化论的意义

Comments on Japanese "Early Marx" Controversy:The Significances of Glossen zu James Mill on the Reconstruction of Marx’s Alienation Theory

In the history of Japanese studies of Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844,there was a famous "Early Marx" debate.The representatives of both sides are Japanese Marxists Wataru Hiromatsu and Seiji Mochizuki.Happened in the 1960s and 1970s,this debate has not only extended the theory of alienation to a broader field,including the alienation of commerce (Verkehr),civil society and reification (Versachlichung),but opened up a new way to re-evaluate alienation theory,and to reconstruct alienation theory with the alienation of commerce also.As a result,Marxists in Japan broke through the interpretive frameworks of alienation theory of the Soviet Union,Eastern Europe and Western Marxism,and completed a "liberation" movement on the study of "Early Marx".In view of this,we should learn from their experiences and lessons to break the "bottleneck" in our studies of alienation and "Early Marx".