4[1]Mehta S. Statistical symmary of clinical results of vascular access procedures for hemodialysis. In: Vascular access for hemodialysqs. SommerBG, Henry ML(Ed). Chicago: Precept Press, 1991,218
5[2]Kaufmam JL. The decline of the autogenous hemodialysis access site. SeminDial, 1995,8:59
6[3]U.S. Renal Data Systm: X. The oost effectiveness of altenative types of vascular access and the econrric cost of ESRD. Am J Kidney Dis ,1995 , ( Suppl )26 :S140
7[4]Miller PE, Carlton D, Deierhoi MH, et al. Natural histoty of arteriovenous grafts in hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney Dis, 2000,36:68
8[5]Vogel KM, Martino MA, O'Brien SP, et al. Cornplications of lower extyemity arteriovenous grafts in patients with end - stage renal disease.South Med J,2000,93:593
9[6]Windus DW, Endrisak MD, Delmez JA. Prothetic fistula survival and complications in hemodialysis patients: effects of diabetes and age. Am J Kiddney Dis, 1992,19:448
10[7]Revanur VK, Jardine AG, Hamilton DH, et al. Outcome for arterio-ve nous fistula at the elbow for hemodiaysis. Clin Transplant , 2000, 14:318
2Rooijens PP, Burgmans JP, Yo TI, et al. Autogenous radial-cephalic or prosthetic brachial-antecubital forearm loop AVF inpatients with compromised vessels? A randomized, multicenterstudy of the patency of primary hemodialysis access [J]. J VaseSurg,2005 ,42(3) :481487.
