摘要
目的探讨"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式和"常规跨区转诊"管理模式对流动人口肺结核患者减少中断治疗的影响。方法将流动人口肺结核患者随机分为研究组和对照组,分别实施"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式和"常规跨区转诊"管理模式的管理,然后分析两种不同管理模式对病人中断治疗率的影响。结果实施"跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式(研究组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为2.0%,"常规跨区转诊"管理模式(对照组)流动人口肺结核患者中断治疗率为9.0%,研究组病人的中断治疗率明显低于对照组(μ=3.04P<0.01),2组有明显差异。结论 "跨区域转诊追踪"管理模式能明显降低跨区域转诊流动人口肺结核的中断治疗率。
Objective To investigate the impact of "Cross-regional referral and tracking" and "Conventional cross-regional referral" management model on TB treatment interruption among floating population living with pulmonary tuberculosis(PTB). Methods The floating population living with PTB was randomly divided into experimental and control groups,which implemented "Cross-regional referral and tracking" and "Conventional cross-regional referral" management model respectively.The impact of these two models on treatment interruption rate was analyzed. Results The treatment interruption rate was 2.0% for experimental group,and 9.0% for control group.The two groups were significantly different(μ=3.04,P0.01). Conclusions "Cross-regional referral and tracking" can significantly reduce the treatment interruption rate among floating population living with PTB.
出处
《中国防痨杂志》
CAS
2010年第9期551-553,共3页
Chinese Journal of Antituberculosis
基金
2008年广东省社会发展领域科技计划项目(83095)
2008年广州市医药卫生科技项目(2008-YB-097)
中国全球基金结核病项目实施性研究课题(TB08-003)
关键词
结核
肺/治疗
病人转诊
治疗结果
tuberculosis
pulmonary/therapy
patient transfer
treatment outcome