期刊文献+

公司规模门槛效应下的董事会独立性与公司价值的关系 被引量:12

The Relation between Board Independence and Corporate Value:Empirical Analysis Based on Corporate Size Threshold Effect
原文传递
导出
摘要 对于独立董事比例与公司价值之间的关系,以往的研究得出了完全不同的两种结论,原因是因为公司在确定独立董事比例可能与公司规模等公司的自身因素大小。本研究通过检验发现,公司规模对独立董事比例具有门槛效果,使用门槛回归模型可以更好的解释独立董事比例和公司价值之间的关系,实证研究的结果表明,在不同公司规模门槛区间,独立董事比例和公司价值之间的相关性有所差异. Researchers got different result about the relation between board independence and corporate value,because of the number of independent directors decided by corporate size in some extent.In this paper,the authors find that there exists threshold effect in corporate size.The panel threshold regressive model(PTRM) can interpret the relation between board independence and corporate value better than OLS model and conic model.Empirical analysis indicates the relation between board independence and corporate value is different in different corporate size region.
出处 《数理统计与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期871-882,共12页 Journal of Applied Statistics and Management
关键词 董事会独立性 公司价值 公司规模 门槛回归模型 board independence corporate value corporate size threshold regressive model
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Fama E F, Jensen M C. Separation of ownership and control [J]. Journal of Law and Economics, 1983, 26: 301-325.
  • 2Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: estimation, testing and inference [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93: 345-368.
  • 3Rosenstein S, Wyatt J G. Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1990, 26: 175-191.
  • 4Xie B, Davidson W N, DaDalt P J. Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2003, 9: 295-316.
  • 5Bhagat S, Black B. The non-correlation between board composition and long-term firm performance [J]. Journal of Corporation Law, 2002, 12: 231-273.
  • 6Baysinger B D, Butler H N. Corporate governance and the board of directors: value effects of changes in board composition [J]. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 1985, 1:101- 124.
  • 7Yermack D. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996, 40: 185-211.
  • 8Bhagat S, Black B. The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance [J]. Business Lawyer, 1999, 54: 921-963.
  • 9李汉军,张俊喜.董事会独立性和有效性的动态分析[J].南开经济研究,2007(6):61-75. 被引量:19
  • 10于东智.资本结构、债权治理与公司绩效:一项经验分析[J].中国工业经济,2003(1):87-94. 被引量:243

二级参考文献63

  • 1彭真明,江华.美国独立董事制度与德国监事会制度之比较——也论中国公司治理结构模式的选择[J].法学评论,2003,21(1):36-42. 被引量:107
  • 2张维迎,吴有昌,马捷.公有制经济中的委托人—代理人关系:理论分析和政策含义[J].经济研究,1995,30(4):10-20. 被引量:374
  • 3青木昌彦.《转轨经济中的公司治理结构——内部人 控制和银行的作用》[M].中国经济出版社,1995..
  • 4李善民 陈正道.《独立董事制度与股东的财富变化 工作论文.中国金融学术研究网,2002.
  • 5Arthur, N. "Board Composition as the Outcome of an Internal Bargaining Process: Empirical Evidence. " Journal of Corporate Finance, 2001,7, pp. 307-340.
  • 6Berle, A. and Means, G. The Modern Corporation and Private Property, 1932. Reprint by Transaction Publishers, 1997.
  • 7Borokhovich, K, A. ; Parrino, P. and Trapani, T. "Outside Directors and CEO Selection. " Journal of Financial Q.uantitative Analysis, 1996, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 337-355,.
  • 8Demsetz, H. and Lehn, K. "The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Cause and Consequence. " Journal oJ Political Economics, Vol. 93, 1985, pp. 1155-1177.
  • 9Fama, E. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm. " Journal of Political Economy, 88, 1980, pp. 288-307.
  • 10Fama, E. and Jensen, M. "Separation of Ownership and Control, " Journal of Law and Economics, Vol, 26, 1983, pp.301-325.

共引文献323

同被引文献199

引证文献12

二级引证文献356

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部