期刊文献+

利用定向岩心进行AE法原地应力测量 被引量:2

INSITU STRESS MEASUREMENT BY A METHOD USING ORIENTED CORE
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在北京市房山区迎风坡花岗闪长岩300m深钻孔中,采用以水泥端帽法为主的岩心定向技术,并在钻进和取心过程中采取特殊措施,在钻孔中距地表25m~301m整个深度段内取得了直径86mm的定向岩心。对深度294m的定向岩心进行了声发射Kaiser效应试验。岩石试件为圆柱形,直径30mm,高度75mm。在垂直方向,利用声发射Kaiser效应估计的垂直主应力为7.7MPa;在294m岩体静岩压力为7.9MPa;两者基本相同。在水平面内,对4个方向的试件进行声发射Kaiser效应试验,得到相应的各个方向的压应力,由此估算的水平最大和最小主应力分别为21.2MPa和12.1MPa。水平面内最大主应力的方向基本为SN方向。将声发射Kaiser效应测量结果与水压致裂法的测量结果进行对比,二者具有很好的一致性。 A borehole was drilled in granodiorite rockmass at Fangshan, Beijing, China. The depth of the borehole is 301m with diameter of 110mm. From about 30m to 301m, all cores were oriented by cement end cap method. AE Kaiser effect tests on oriented core at depth of 294m were carried out. The rock specimens are the cylinders with 30mm diameter and 75mm height. In vertical direction, the vertical stress estimated by AE Kaiser effect tests is 7.7 MPa. The lithostatic pressure at the depth of 294m in granodiorite rockmass is 7.9 MPa. Both of them are almost same. In horizontal plane, for four directions rock specimen, AE Kaiser effect tests were carried out and their corresponding normal stresses were gotten. The horizontal maximum and minimum principal stresses are 21 2 MPa and 12 1 MPa respectively. The orientation of horizontal maximum principal stress is about the NS trending. Comparing the result of AE Kaiser effect tests with hydrofracturing shows that they are consistent fundamentally.
出处 《地质力学学报》 CSCD 1999年第1期85-89,共5页 Journal of Geomechanics
关键词 声发射 KAISER效应 地应力 定向岩心 AE Kaiser effect stress core orientation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1李方全 张伯崇 等.中国三峡地下800m深部应力测量——中日合作AE法与水压致裂法对比研究[M].北京:地震出版社,1992..
  • 2李宏.北京房山花岗岩体AE法应力测量研究.地壳构造与地壳应用文集[M].北京:地震出版社,1997..
  • 3Li Hong.地壳构造与地壳应力文集[M].北京:地震出版社,1996..
  • 4李宏,地壳构造与地壳应力文集,1997年
  • 5Li Hong,地壳构造与地壳应力文集,1996年
  • 6李方全,三峡坝区水库诱发地震研究茅坪钻孔的现场测试与分析,1993年
  • 7李方全,中国三峡地下800m深部应力测量——中日合作AE法与水压致裂法对比研究,1992年
  • 8Thiencelin M J,ProcInternational Symposium on Engineering in Complex Rock Formations,1986年,278页

同被引文献32

  • 1李满洲,余强,郭启良,陈群策,安其美.地应力测量在矿床突水防治中的应用——以河南夹沟铝土矿床突水防治工程为例[J].地球学报,2006,27(4):373-378. 被引量:4
  • 2周宏伟,谢和平,左建平.深部高地应力下岩石力学行为研究进展[J].力学进展,2005,35(1):91-99. 被引量:421
  • 3何满潮,谢和平,彭苏萍,姜耀东.深部开采岩体力学研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(16):2803-2813. 被引量:2081
  • 4孔凡顺,孙如华,李文平.彭庄井田区域地应力场分析[J].煤田地质与勘探,2005,33(4):14-17. 被引量:5
  • 5张茹,谢和平,刘建锋,邓建辉,彭琦.单轴多级加载岩石破坏声发射特性试验研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2006,25(12):2584-2588. 被引量:188
  • 6Dey T N, Brown D W. Stress measurement in a deep granitic rock mass using hydraulic fracturing and differential strain curve analysis[A]. In: Stephansson O ed. Proc of 6th International Symposium on Rock Stress and Rock Stress Measurement[C]. Lulea, Sweden: [s.n.], 1986, 351-357.
  • 7Marsui H, Sato T, Sugihara K. Comparison of the results of stress measurements determined by various methods at the Kamaishi mine[A]. In: Sugawara & Obara ed. Rock Stress[C]. Netherlands: A A Balkema, 1997, 95-100.
  • 8Kudo R, Yokoyama T. Stress measurements with core samples by AE-DRA methods in the 1995 Hyogoken-nanbu earthquake source region[A]. In: Sugawara & Obara ed. Rock Stress[C]. Netherlands: A A Balkema, 1997, 359-362.
  • 9Kanagawa T, Hayashi M, Nakasa H. Estimation of spatial geostress components in rock samples using the Kaiser effect of acoustic emission[A]. In: Proc of 3rd Acoustic Emission Symposium[C]. Tokyo: [s. n. ], 1976, 229-248.
  • 10Yosihikawa S, Mogi K. A new method for estimation the crustal stress from cored samples: laboratory study in the case of unaxial compression[J]. Tectonophysics, 1981, 74:323-339.

引证文献2

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部