期刊文献+

18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖PET-CT显像预测Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌的预后 被引量:10

Prognostic value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated by concurrent chemoradiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(FDG)PET-CT显像在Ⅲ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)疗效评价及预后判断中的价值.方法 46例NSCLC患者分别在放疗前1周及放疗剂量达到40~50 Gy时进行18F-FDG PET-CT显像检查,以最大标准摄取值(SUVmax)的变化百分率为50%为分割点,将46例患者分为治疗有反应组(A组)和无反应组(B组),对比分析两组治疗前和治疗中的SUVmax值及其变化率与疗效和预后的关系.结果 A组25例,B组21例.A组和B组治疗前的SUVmax值分别为7.59±3.14和14.72±4.67,治疗中的SUVmax值分别为2.89±1.39和9.82±3.31,两组差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).A组和B组SUVmax值变化百分率分别为61.9%±8.7%和33.6%±9.0%,差异有统计学意义(P=0.007).A组和B组患者的1年生存率分别为68.0%和38.1%,2年生存率分别为64.0%和33.3%,两组差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05).Logistic回归分析显示,治疗前和治疗中的SUVmax以及两者的变化百分率与NSCLC患者的预后有关.结论 治疗前和治疗中的SUVmax以及两者的变化百分率可作为Ⅲ期NSCLC患者早期疗效评价和预后判断的重要参考指标. Objective To evaluate the value of 18F-FDG PET-CT for assessment of therapeutic response and prediction of patient outcome after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Forty six patients with histologically proven stage Ⅲ NSCLC had two repeated 18 F-FDG PET-CT scans either one week before therapy and at the dose of 40 ~ 50 Gy. The SUVmax and changes of the two groups were compared with ( 1 ) the therapeutic response and (2) treatment results and long-term survival. Results Of the 46 eligible cases, the pretreatment SUVmax of the responding and non-responding groups was 7.59 ± 3.14 and 14.72 ± 4.67, respectively. The midtreatment SUVmax of the two groups was 2.89 ± 1.39 and 9.82 ± 3.31, respectively. Significiant difference ( t = 4.74, P = 0.001 ;t =7.23, P =0. 001 )in SUVmax was observed both before and during treatment. Furthermore, the percentage change of pretreatment and midtreatment SUVmax was △SUVmax= 61.9% ±8.7% and △SUVmax =33.6% ±9.0%, also with a significiant difference between the two groups (t = 2.83, P = 0.007 ). In addition, the 1-year survival rate of the the responding and non-responding groups was 68.0% and 38.1%, respectively.The 2-year survival rate of the two groups was 64.0% and 33.3%, respectively,with a significiant difference between the two groups ( P = 0. 043, P = 0. 038 ). Conclusion 18 F-FDG PET-CT is highly effective in detecting therapeutic response in stage Ⅲ NSCLC patients. The analysis of percentage change of SUVmax provides incremental value in early prediction of therapeutic response and patient outcome.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第8期603-606,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 非小细胞肺 正电子发射断层显像术 18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖 预后 Carcinoma, non-small-cell lung Positron-emission tomography 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献66

共引文献71

同被引文献157

  • 1ZHANG Zhen-jiang,CHEN Jing-han,MENG Long,DU Jia-jun,ZHANG Lin,LIU Ying,DAI Hong-hai.^(18)F-FDG uptake as a biologic factor predicting outcome in patients with resected non-small-cell lung cancer[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2007(2):125-131. 被引量:17
  • 2孟雪,付正,杜洁,孙新东,杨国仁,于金明.^(18)FDG PET/CT标准摄取值与非小细胞肺癌临床分期关系的研究[J].中华肿瘤防治杂志,2006,13(24):1879-1881. 被引量:14
  • 3Nahmias C, Hanna WT, Wahl LM, et al. Time course of early response to chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients with 18-F FDG PET/CT[J]. J Nuel Med, 2007, 48:744-751.
  • 4Imamura Y, Azuma K, Kurata S, et al. Prognostic value of SUV- max measurements obtained by FDG-PET in patients with non- small cell lung cancer receiving chemotherapy[ J]. Lung Cancer, 2011,71:49-54.
  • 5Aukema 'IS, Kappers I, Olmos RA, et al. Is 18F-FDG PET/CT useful for the early prediction of histopathologic response to neo- adjuvant erlotinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer? [J]. J Nucl Med, 2010, 51:1344-1348.
  • 6Cronin CG, Swords R, Truong MT, et al. Clinical utility of PET/CT in lymphoma [ J ]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2010, 194 : 91-103.
  • 7Duch J,Fuster D, Munoz M, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT for early prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer[ J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2009, 36 : 1551-1557.
  • 8Jung SY, Kim SK, Nam BH, et al. Prognostic lmpact of [18F] FDG-PET in operable breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy[ J]. Ann Surg Oncal, 2010, 17:247-253.
  • 9de Geus-Oei LF, Vriens D, van Laarhoven HW, et al. Monito- ring and predicting response to therapy with 18F-FDG PET in colorectal cancer: a systematic review [ J ]. J Nucl Med, 2009, 50:43-54.
  • 10Port JL, Kent MS, Korst R J, et al. Positron emission tomography scanning poorly predicts response to preoperative chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer[ J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2004, 77: 254-259.

引证文献10

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部