期刊文献+

棘突间动态内固定装置治疗腰痛的临床应用评价 被引量:9

Clinical evaluation of interspinous dynamic internal fixation for low back pain
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 评价采用Coflex棘突间动态内固定植入术治疗腰痛的临床疗效及相关影像学改变.方法 2007年2月至2009年6月,对45例患者行Coflex棘突间内固定植入术,男26例,女19例;年龄45~70岁,平均51.4岁.治疗节段:L4.5 32例,L5S111例,L4.5、L5S1双节段2例.手术采用椎板开窗或部分切除,椎管减压后棘突间植入Coflex装置.按照Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disabi1ity index,ODI)和日本矫形外科学会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分评价术前及术后随访时的临床疗效,计算恢复率.同时行影像学观察,包括椎间隙高度和椎间孔形态,手术节段椎体活动度和腰椎生理曲度,手术及相邻节段的MRI信号改变.结果 术后随访时间1O-34个月,平均24个月.ODI由术前62.82±10.42降至末次随访时11.80±3.35;JOA评分由9.00±2.63提高至24.65±1.86;最终疗效评价为显效的患者共40例,显效率为89%.L4.5、L5S1节段术后Cobb角分别为15.1°±3.9°和16.3°±3.8°,均较术前减小,生理曲度改善.L4.5节段椎体活动度(range of motion,ROM)由术前6.5°±1.5°增加至术后8.4°±2.6°,而L5S1节段ROM手术前后没有明显改变.无论是L4.5或是L5S1节段,末次随访时其椎间隙背侧高度、棘突顶距、椎间孔高度和椎间孔面积均较术前显著增加.结论 Coflex棘突间动态内固定中期随访临床疗效显著,并且保留了腰椎生理曲度和节段运动,增加并维持椎间隙高度和椎间孔面积,在手术节段椎间盘修复及防止相邻节段椎间盘退变等方面作用显著. Objective To evaluate the mid-term clinical effects and the imaging changes of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation for low back pain. Methods From February 2007 to June 2009,Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation was performed in a consecutive 45 patients. They included 26 males and 19 females, with an average of 51.4 years ranging in age from 45 to 70 years. Thirty-two cases were in L4.5 level, 11 in L5S1 level and 2 in both two levels. The patients were treated with limited laminectomy and implanted with Coflex device. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI)scores and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) questionnaires before and after operation. The imaging examination was obtained to assess height of the intervertebral space, area of the intervertebral foramen,segment movement of the operation level, low lumbar curvature and signal of the lumbar disc on MRI. Results The follow-up time ranged from 10 to 34 months, with an average of 24 months. The ODI scores decreased significantly from 62.82±10.42 preoperatively to 11.80±3.35 postoperatively. The JOA scores were improved remarkably from 9.00±2.63 preoperatively to 24.65±1.86 postoperatively. The proportion with optimal effect was 89% (40 cases). The Cobb angle after operation of L4.5 and L5S1 level was 15.1°±3.9° and 16.3°±3.8° respectively, which was significantly decreased after operation. The range of motion of the L4.5 level increased from 6.5°±1.5° to 8.4°±2.6° while the L5S1 level did not change notedly. The heights of the dorsal intervertebral disc, distance of the spinous processes, intervertebral foramen height and area were significantly higher than those before operation. Conclusion The Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation is available to reserve segment movement, to increase intervertebral space height and foramen area. Meanwhile,it is effective to self-repair and prevent degeneration for the disc in adjacent levels.
出处 《中华骨科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第9期848-853,共6页 Chinese Journal of Orthopaedics
关键词 腰椎 内固定器 外科手术 腰痛 Lumbar vertebrae Internal fixator Surgical procedures, operative Low back pai
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Kumar MN,Baklanov A,Chopin D.Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion.Eur Spine J,2001,10(4):314-319.
  • 2Cunningham BW,Kotani Y,McNulty PS,et al.The effect of spinal destabilization and instrumentation on lumbar intradiscal pressure:an in vitro biomechanical analysis.Spine,1997,22(22):2655-2663.
  • 3Lee CK.Accelerated degeneration of the segment adjacent to a lumbar fusion.Spine,1988,13(3):375-377.
  • 4Glaser J,Stanley M,Sayre H,et al.A 10-year follow-up evaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation.Spine,2003,28(13):1390-1395.
  • 5Bono CM,Vaccaro AR.Interspinous process devices in the lumbar spine.J Spinal Disord Tech,2007,20(3):255-261.
  • 6胡有谷.腰椎间盘退变的MRI诊断[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2005,41(3):189-191. 被引量:12
  • 7Schlegel JD,Champine J,Taylor MS,et al.The role of distraction in improving the space available in the lumbar stenotic canal and foramen.Spine,1994,19(18):2041-2047.
  • 8Tsai KJ,Murakami H,Lowery GL,et al.A biomechanical evaluation of an interspinous device (Coflex) used to stabilize the lumbar spine.J Surg Orthop Adv,2006,15(3):167-172.
  • 9Cabraja M,Abbushi A,Woiciechowsky C,et al.The short-and mid-term effect of dynamic interspinous distraction in the treatment of recurrent lumbar facet joint pain.Eur Spine J,2009,18(11):1686-1694.
  • 10Zucherman JF,Hsu KY,Hartjen CA,et al.A prospective randomized multi-center study for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis with the X STOP interspinous implant:1-year results.Eur Spine J,2004,13(1):22-31.

二级参考文献7

  • 1王沛,郭世绂.腰骶神经通道和腰骶神经根病的发病学[J].中华骨科杂志,1996,16(12):796-798. 被引量:37
  • 2Kunogi J,Hasue M.Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression.Spine,1991,16:1312-1320.
  • 3Burton CV,Kirkaldy-Willis WH,Yong-Hing K.Causes of failure ofsurgery on the lumbar spine.Clin Orthop,1981,(157):191-199.
  • 4Hasegawa T,An HS,Haughton VM,et al.Lumbar foraminal steno-sis:critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina:a cry-omicrotome study in cadavera.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),1995,77:32-38.
  • 5Nowicki BH,Yu S,Reinartz J,et al.Effect of axial loading on neu-ral foramina and nerve roots in the lumbar spine.Radiology,1990,176:433-437.
  • 6Cinotti G,De Santis P,Nofroni I,et al.Stenosis of lumbar interver-tebral foramen:anatomic study on predisposing factors.Spine,2002,27:223-229.
  • 7Postacchini F.Surgical management of lumbar spinal stenosis.Spine,1999,24:1043-1047.

共引文献34

同被引文献123

  • 1赵兴,范顺武.腰椎及腰骶椎融合术后邻近节段的退行性疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2005,25(10):618-621. 被引量:12
  • 2关凯,孙天胜,李放,时述山.动态固定及其在腰椎退行性疾病中的应用现状[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(9):709-711. 被引量:9
  • 3Gibson JN, Grant Jc, Waddell G. Cochrane review of surgery for lum- bar disc prolapse and degenerative lumb spondylosjs [ J]. Spine, 1999,17 : 1820 - 1832.
  • 4Seneges J. Mechanical supplementation by nonrigid fixation in degen- erative intervertebral lumbar segments : the Wallis system [ J ] . Eur Spine J,2003,4:369 - 377.
  • 5Kroeber M, Unglaub F, Guehring T, et aL Effects of controlled dy- namic disc distraction on degenerated intervertebral discs:an invivo study on the rabbit lumbar spine model [ J ]. Spine, 2005,2 : 181 - 187.
  • 6swanson KE, Lindsey DP, Hsu KY, et al. The effects on interspinous implant on intervertebraI disc pressures[ J ]. Spine ,2003,1:26 -32.
  • 7Glaser J, Stanley M, Sayre H, et al. A lO-year follow-upevaluation of lumbar spine fusion with pedicle screw fixation. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976) , 2003, 28 : 1390-1395.
  • 8Kumar MN, Baklanov A, Chopin D. Correlation between sagittal plane changes and adjacent segment degeneration following lumbar spine fusion. Eur Spine J, 2001, 10.. 314-319.
  • 9Bono CM, Vaccaro AR. Interspinous process deviees in the lumbar spine. J Spinal Disord Teeh, 2007, 20: 255-261.
  • 10Riehards JC, Majumdar S, Lindsey DP, et al. The treatment mechanism of an interspinous process implant for lumbar neurogenie intermittent claudieation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976 ), 2005, 30:744-749.

引证文献9

二级引证文献48

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部