期刊文献+

谱分解技术在SZ36-1油田时移流体监测中的应用分析 被引量:4

Application of spectral decomposition to detect time-lapse fluid in SZ36-1 oilfield
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在渤海SZ36-1油田的不断注水开采过程中,有的区域含水饱和度增加非常大,有的区域则压力下降太多而导致脱气。为了监测流体的变化,对该区域实施了时移地震应用。但在常规的时移地震属性差异体上,很难同时监测注水异常区域和脱气异常区域。利用该地区的储层物性建立了楔状砂体地质模型,正演模拟其时移地震响应差异,利用傅里叶变换分析地震反射波在不同厚度下注水和脱气引起的不同频谱响应特征。对时移地震数据运用谱分解技术,获得了一系列频率的调谐振幅数据体,通过在低频段分析注水引起的负异常和在高频段分析脱气引起的正异常,从而有效地划分了流体异常区域。这对于更好地利用谱分解技术进行储层流体识别,以及时移地震资料的差异分析解释提供了有效地指导。 In the course of water flooding in Pohai SZ36-1 oilfield,water saturation became very large in some regions whereas the pressure in other regions dropped significantly resulting in degassing.Time-lapse seismic analysis was implemented to monitor the fluid changes in the oilfield.The difference between conventional time-lapse seismic attribute volumes is usually not suitable for simultaneously monitoring anomalies from water flooding and degassing.Based on reservoir petrophysics observations,we established a wedge model to simulate the time-lapse seismic reflections.We analyzed the spectral responses of seismic reflections to different thickness in areas of water flooding and degassing by performing Fourier transform on the time-lapse seismic data.Then we used spectral decomposition technique to obtain a series of tuning frequency amplitude volume.We conclude that the negative anomalies in low-frequency end are caused by water flooding whereas the positive anomalies in high-frequency end are caused by degassing.
出处 《勘探地球物理进展》 2010年第4期289-293,共5页 Progress in Exploration Geophysics
基金 国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2006AA09A102-14)资助
关键词 时移地震 谱分解 楔状模型 频谱响应 注水 脱气 time-lapse seismic spectral decomposition wedge model spectral response water flooding degassing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献12

  • 1宋维琪,赵万金,冯磊,吴华.地震高分辨率反演和地质模拟联合预测薄储层[J].石油学报,2005,26(1):50-54. 被引量:21
  • 2汪超,赵春明,张迎春,刘超.绥中36-1油田转注方案的数值模拟研究及实施效果分析[J].中国海上油气(工程),2005,17(2):105-107. 被引量:9
  • 3林承焰,张宪国,董春梅.地震沉积学及其初步应用[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):69-72. 被引量:199
  • 4Partyka G, Gridley J, Lopez J. Interpretational applications of spectral decomposition in reservoir characterization [J]. The Leading Edge, 1999,18(3) :353-360.
  • 5Castagna J, Sun S, Siegfried R W. Instantaneous spectral analysis:Detection of low-frequency shadows associated with hydrocarbons[J]. The Leading Edge, 2003,22 (2) : 120-127.
  • 6Castagna J, Sun S. Comparison of spectral decomposition methods [J]. First Break,2006,24(3) :75-79.
  • 7Batzle M, Wang Z. Seismic properties of pore fluids [J]. Geophysics, 1992,57(11) : 1396-1408.
  • 8Chen G, Finn C, Neelamani R. Spectral decomposition response to reservoir fluids from a deepwater reservoir:Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 76th Annual Meeting, New Orieans, Louisiana,October 1-6,2006[C]. Tulsa Soc. Expl. Geophys. ,2006.
  • 9Dvorkin J, Mavko G. Modeling attenuation in reservoir and nonreservoir rock [J]. The Leading Edge,2006,25(2) :194-197.
  • 10Deng J, Han D. Application of spectral decomposition to detect deepwater gas reservoir:Society of Exploration Geophysicists International Exposition and 76th Annual Meeting, New Orieans, Louisiana,October 1-6,2006 [C]. Tulsa: Soc. Expl. Geophys., 2006.

共引文献15

同被引文献117

引证文献4

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部