期刊文献+

腹腔镜胆总管探查取石一期缝合疗效的荟萃分析 被引量:19

The therapeutic effects of primary suture after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨腹腔镜胆总管探查取石一期缝合的疗效。方法:通过检索Pubmed、Medline数据库,对1990~2009年有关腹腔镜胆总管探查取石一期缝合(包括植入胆道支架一期缝合及直接一期缝合)与腹腔镜胆总管探查取石"T"管外引流病例的对照研究资料进行荟萃分析。结果:共纳入6篇文献,413例患者。分析结果显示,一期缝合组与"T"管外引流组相比,手术时间、术后总体并发症、术后胆道并发症的发生率两组差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但术后住院时间一期缝合组明显短于"T"管外引流组(P〈0.00001)。结论:腹腔镜胆总管探查取石一期缝合安全可行,疗效肯定,而且能明显减少术后住院时间。 Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effects of primary suture following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.Methods:Meta-analysis was performed to access the effects of primary suture(including primary suture after implantation of biliary stent and directly primary suture) comparing with T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration by a comprehensive Pubmed and Medline database retrieval from 1990 to 2009.Results:A total of 6 literatures involving 413 patients were retrieved for analysis.There was no significant difference in operating time,postoperatively total complication and biliary tract complications between the primary suture and T-tube drainage groups(P0.05);Postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter in the primary suture group than that in the T-tube drainage group(P0.00001).Conclusions:The primary suture following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration is safe,feasible and effective,and it can significantly reduce postoperative hospital stay.
出处 《腹腔镜外科杂志》 2010年第9期681-685,共5页 Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
关键词 胆总管结石 腹腔镜检查 一期缝合 胆道支架 META分析 Choledocholithiasis Laparoscopy Primary closure Biliary stent Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Ponsky JL,Heniford BT,Gersin K.Choledocholithiasis:evolving intraoperative strategies[J].Am Surg,2000,66(3):262-268.
  • 2Hungness ES,Soper NJ.Management of common bile duct stones[J].J Gastrointest Surg,2006,10(4):612-619.
  • 3Cuschieri A,Lezoche E,Morino M,et al.E.A.E.S.multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing two-stage vs single-stage management of patients with gallstone disease and ductal calculi[J].Surg Endosc,1999,13(10):952-957.
  • 4Griniatsos J,Karvounis E,Arbuckle J,et al.Cost-effective method for laparoscopic choledochotomy[J].ANZ J Surg,2005,75(1-2):35-38.
  • 5Jameel M,Darmas B,Baker AL.Trend towards primary closure following laparoscopic exploration of the common bile duct[J].Ann R Coll Surg Engl,2008,90(1):29-35.
  • 6Martin IJ,Bailey IS,Rhodes M,et al.Towards T-tube free laparoscopic bile duct exploration:A methodologic evolution during 300 consecutive procedures[J].Ann Surg,1998,228(1):29-34.
  • 7Zhang WJ,Xu GF,Wu GZ,et al.Laparoscopic exploration of common bile duct with primary closure versus T-tube drainage:a randomized clinical trial[J].J Surg Res,2009,157(1):e1-5.
  • 8Leida Z,Ping B,Shuguang W,et al.A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy[J].Surg Endosc,2008,22(7):1595-1600.
  • 9Ha JP,Tang CN,Siu WT,et al.Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic choledochotomy for common bile duct stones[J].Hepatogastroenterology,2004,51(60):1605-1608.
  • 10Isla AM,Griniatsos J,Karvounis E,et al.Advantages of laparoscopic stented choledochorrhaphy over T-tube placement[J].Br J Surg,2004,91(7):862-866.

同被引文献114

引证文献19

二级引证文献123

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部