期刊文献+

理解的公共性与自主性及其难度——私人语言、语言游戏与生活形式的纠葛 被引量:1

The Commonly or Dependent Understanding and Their Difficulty:The Imbroglio of Private Language or Language-game and Forms of Life
下载PDF
导出
摘要 无论是对外部事件还是对自我的把握,理解至关紧要。现象主义和心理主义过分强调"内知觉",从而有陷入"唯我论"的危险;现象学讲究"移情"和"亲知",但如果这些都脱离了外部世界,理解也必然是一种空谈和幻想。当胡塞尔最终祭出"主体间性"和"生活世界"的理念时,实际上他已看出"意向性"和"回到事实本身"的艰难,也更加明确了理解的复杂性和相关性。维特根斯坦通过摒弃私人语言和转入日常生活语言研究,用语言游戏和生活形式(forms of life)阐释了这一难度,同时他也在新的立场和维度上解释了理解的有效性。 Understanding is very important in which we hold exterior and ego.They would plunge solipsism because they were very extraordinary emphasized 'inner-perception' in phenomenalism and psychologism.It was insisted on that 'empathy' and 'self-apperceive' in phenomenology,but understanding would turn into prattle-pratlle and illusion if they broke away exterior world.In fact,Husserl knew the difficulty in which 'intentionality' and 'date back to affairs' and found understanding was very complex when he brought forward 'inter-subject' and 'worlds of life'.Wittgenstein interpreted the difficulty by his 'language-game'and'forms of life'in his study that private language was gave up and turned into the study of daily language.At the same time,He interpreted the validity of understanding by a new position and dimensionality.Understanding has relation with our subsistence and reality,our communication and they were realized.So that it would be interpreted what we can understand,whereas it is not so.
作者 张中
机构地区 复旦大学中文系
出处 《山西大同大学学报(社会科学版)》 2010年第4期13-16,共4页 Journal of Shanxi Datong University(Social Science Edition)
关键词 理解 私人语言 语言游戏 生活形式 交往 有效性 understanding private language language-game forms of life communication validity
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1[奥]维特根斯坦著,绍甲译.逻辑哲学论[M].北京:商务印书馆,1999.
  • 2[奥]维特根斯坦著,李步楼译,陈维杭校.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.
  • 3寇鹏程.古典、浪漫与现代[M].上海:上海三联书店,2005.
  • 4[英]以赛亚·伯林著,孙尚扬,杨深译.启蒙的时代:十八世纪哲学家[M].南京:译林出版社,2005.
  • 5[英]M·麦金著,李国山译.维特根斯坦与《哲学研究》[M].桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2007.
  • 6[奥]M·石里克著,李步楼译.普通认识论[M].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 7[德]哈贝马斯著,洪佩郁等译.交往行动理论[M].重庆:重庆出版社,1994.
  • 8[德]哈贝马斯著,曹卫东,付德根译.后形而上学思想[M].南京:译林出版社,2001.
  • 9Locke:An Essay concerning Human Understanding[M].Oxford University Press,1975.
  • 10张庆熊.维特根斯坦对“说明”和“理解”的重新思考[J].陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,38(2):5-11. 被引量:4

二级参考文献4

  • 1W. DILTHEY. Gesammelte Sehliften[M]. Leipzig/Berlin, 1914-1936, Bd. 5,S. 144.
  • 2亚里士多德.正位篇[M].北京:人民文学出版社,1962.
  • 3《狄尔泰全集》德文版第5卷(W.Dilthey, Gesammelte Schliften, Leipzig/Berlin, 1914 - 1936,Bd.5),第139-240页.
  • 4维特根斯坦 李步楼译.哲学研究[M].北京:商务印书馆,1996.31、7.

共引文献9

同被引文献6

  • 1Thomas Pynchon.The Crying of Lot 49.Harper Perennial,2006.
  • 2Thomas H.Schuab.Pynchon:The voice of Ambiguity[M].University of Illiois Press,1981.
  • 3John P.Stark.Pynchon's Fictions:Thomas Pynchon and the Literature of Information[M].Ohio UP,1980.
  • 4(奥)维特根斯坦(著),李海峰译.哲学研究[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2009.
  • 5(美)格里芬著,王成年译.后现代精神[M].中央编译出版社,2011.
  • 6(德)黑格尔著,贺麟,王太庆等译.哲学史讲演录(第一卷)[M].上海人民出版社,2013.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部