期刊文献+

护理本科生参与客观结构化临床考试的质性研究 被引量:40

A qualitative study on nursing undergraduates′ experiences of participation in objective structured clinical examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解护理本科生对客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)的真实评价,为我国护理教育进一步完善OSCE提供参考。方法深入访问12名参加OSCE的护理本科生,使用Colaizzi的分析程序进行分析,提炼主题。结果护理本科生参加OSCE的真实体验主要包括3个主题:考试方式新颖客观、综合能力得到考查、标准化病人(SP)对护生有积极和消极两方面的影响。结论护理本科生认可并接受OSCE,认为OSCE可检测被考者的真实综合能力,但SP存在一定局限性。建议统一规范的OSCE培训和考核体系,用于招募SP和实施OSCE,以确保OSCE质量。 Objective To comprehend nursing undergraduates′ appraisal of OSCE,and to provide information for improvement of OSCE in nursing education.Methods A purposive sample of 12 nursing undergraduates were interviewed in-depth,themes representing participant′s descriptions were created by using Colaizzi′s analysis process.Results Three major themes were identified as follows:the examination was novel and objective,the examination was able to test students′ comprehensive capabilities,standardized patients had positive and negative impact on students.Conclusion Nursing undergraduates accept OSCE and convince that it could test comprehensive capability and SP has limitations.Educators should establish unified training and evaluation system to train SP and conduct OSCE,and to improve quality of OSCE.
出处 《护理学杂志(综合版)》 2010年第10期57-59,共3页 Journal of Nursing Science
关键词 护理 本科生 客观结构化临床考试 标准化病人 体验 质性研究 nursing undergraduates OSCE standardized patients experience qualitative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Harden R M,Stevenson M,Downie W W,et al.Assessment of clinical competence using objective structured examination[J].Br Med J,1975,1(5955):447-451.
  • 2景汇泉,于晓松,孙宝志.OSCE在医学教育中的应用[J].国外医学(医学教育分册),2002,23(2):29-33. 被引量:185
  • 3Bartfay W J,Rombough R,Howse E,et al.Evaluation.The OSCE approach in nursing education[J].Can Nurse,2004,100(3):18-23.
  • 4陈军,蔡福满,尹志勤,王世泽,施秀剑.简化OSCE模式在护生毕业考核中的应用[J].护理学杂志(外科版),2007,22(5):55-56. 被引量:27
  • 5隋树杰,仰曙芬,朱雪梅.护理临床模拟教学系统应用效果分析[J].护理学杂志(外科版),2009,24(2):79-80. 被引量:15
  • 6王斌全,郑洁,金瑞华,商临萍,马玉萍.护理专业本科毕业生客观结构化临床考试的实施及评价[J].护理研究(下旬版),2007,21(10):2729-2731. 被引量:11
  • 7Janice M.Qualitative research methods for health professionals[M].Louisiana:Sage Publications,1995:24.
  • 8Patton M Q.Qualitative research&evaluation methods[M].3rd ed.California:Thousand Oaks,2002:75-142.
  • 9Minichiello V,Aroni R,Timewell E,et al.In depth interviewing[M].Melbourne:Longman,1995:138-152.
  • 10Colaizzi P.Psychological research as the phenomenologists view it[M] //Vaile R,King M.Existential-pheno-menological alternatives for psychology.New York:Oxford University Press,1978:48-71.

二级参考文献39

共引文献369

同被引文献384

引证文献40

二级引证文献448

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部