关于信托受益权的性质——对有关国家法学界的有关研究的审视与检讨

The Nature of Trust Beneficial Interest——The Contemplation and Criticism for Studies in the Law Science Circle of Relevant Nations

就对信托受益权性质的研究而言,联系英美信托法对该权利的内容的规定来进行为英美法学界在方法论方面的特点,学者持有的对人权说、对物权说与折衷说均能够在该法中寻找到支持;通过对想像力的发挥来进行为日本法学界在方法论方面的特点,在学者持有的债权说、四宫说、大阪谷说与田中说中仅债权说能够在1922年日本信托法中寻找到支持;无视我国信托法对该权利的内容的态度、将该法规定由委托人享有但可以由受益人行使的若干权利视为该权利的内容并联系这一规定来进行为我国法学界在方法论方面的特点,学者持有的物权说、物权债权并行说与物权债权与监督权集合说在该法中均不能够寻找到支持,基于其这一态度该法中的该权利为债权。

The study of the nature of trust beneficial interest, the characteristic of the study method in common law system＇s law science circle is contracting the study and the content of the provisions of the interest in the law system trust law. The view of jus in person, jus ad rem and eclecticism held by the scholars can all be supported by the law. The corresponding characteristic in Japanese law science circle is the study through playing imagination. Among the view of obligatory right, Shigong, Dabangu and Tienzong held by scholars, only the view of obligatory right can be supported by 1922 Japan Trust Law. It is ignoring the approach of China Trust Law about the content of the inter- est, making some rights according to the law to truster but may be exercised by beneficiary. The view of right rem and obligatory right, the view of mustering right in rem and obligatory with supervision power held by the scholars can not all be supported by the law.