论TRIPs协议中三步检验法的理论与适用——以《一个馒头引发的血案》为例

On the Theory and Application of Three-Step Inspection in TRIPs——Take the Case of "A Murder Evoked by A Steamed Bun" as Example

法学界在讨论《一个馒头引发的血案》是否构成侵权时,多以西方版权法为视角,然而,这样的论证却忽视国际的一般做法。在经济全球化的今天,只有以国际视角的"合理使用"分析才能同时获得合法性和正当性,TRIPs协议第13条的三步检验法即限定于某些特殊情形、不与作品的正常利用相冲突与不得不合理地损害权利持有人的正当利益对该事件及今后类似的问题提供了较好的思维进路。

When the video 'A murder evoked by a steamed bun' is discussed in the jurisprudence circle,most views are taken from the angle of Western Copyright Law to decide whether there an infringement of copyright exists. But such demonstration ignores the common international practice. Today,with the economic globalization,only through international angle,with rational use and analysis can legality and validity be acquired The Three-Steps of Inspection in the thirteenth article of TRIPs,which are 'restricted to specific circumstances','not clashed with rational use of production','no irrationally harmful to proper interest of Right Holder' ,provides a good thinking way to this above mentioned and other similar situations to appear in the future.