摘要
目的:评价针灸治疗哮喘的有效性。方法:计算机检索2000-2009年重庆维普、中国知网、PubMed、HighWire数据库关于针灸治疗哮喘的临床研究文献,选择符合要求的随机对照试验(RCT)、临床对照试验(CCT)文献进行Meta分析。结果:共纳入22篇文献,合计3058例哮喘患者,分析发现针灸治疗哮喘的总有效率优于对照组[OR=4.18,95%CI(3.36,5.20),Z=12.85,P<0.00001];第1秒末用力呼气量(FEV1)的两组间比较不具有统计学意义[OR=0.20,95%CI(-0.37,0.76),Z=0.68,P=0.50];治疗后最大呼气流速(PEFR)测量结果的两组间比较差异具有统计学意义[OR=0.42,95%CI(0.22,0.62),Z=4.06,P<0.0001];治疗后用力肺活量(FVC)测量结果的两组间比较差异具有统计学意义[OR=0.45,95%CI(0.17,0.72),Z=3.22,P=0.001];治疗后FEV1/FVC测量结果的两组间比较差异具有统计学意义[OR=9.58,95%CI(8.14,11.02),Z=13.03,P<0.00001]。结论:针灸疗法能够显著提高哮喘治疗的总有效率,PE-FR、FVC、FEV1/FVC能够作为哮喘疗效判定的指标,但FEV1却无统计学意义。由于RCT、CCT文献数量过少,特别是高质量、大样本、多中心的随机临床研究报道极少,且文献发表偏倚的存在,因此上述结果还需要进一步深入研究。
Objective To assess the efficacy of acupuncture and moxibustion for asthma by meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. Methods A literature search in VIP, CNKI, PubMed and HighWire was performed to retrieve clinic trials documents about acupuncture for asthma from 2000 to 2009. The meta-analysis was conducted on RCT and CCT documents that meet the enrolling requirements. Results Twenty-two trials including 3 058 cases of asthma patients were included in this study. The findings indicates that the total effective rate in acupuncture group was significantly superior to control group fOR: 4. 18, 95% CI (3.36, 5.20), Z=12.85, P〈0. 000 01]; there was no significant difference in FEV1 measurements between two groups fOR=0.20, 95 % CI (-0.37, 0.76), Z=0. 68, P: 0.50]; there was profound significant difference in PEFR measurements between two groups [OR=0.42, 95% CI (0.22, 0.62), Z=4.06, P〈0. 000 1]; there was profound significant difference in FVC measurements between two groups [OR=0.45, 95% CI (0.17, 0.72), Z=3.22, P=0. 001]; there was profound significant difference in FEV1/FVC measurements between two groups [OR = 9.58, 95% CI (8.14, 11.02), Z= 13.03, P〈0. 000 01]. Conclusion Acupuncture and moxibustion therapy can significantly improve the total effective rate of acupuncture for asthma. PEFR, FVC, FEV1/FVC can be used as effectiveness indicators for evaluating the treatment for asthma. The FEV1 measurements did not have statistic significance. Due to the small number of RCT/CCT documents, the bias of the literatures and the lack of high-quality, large sample and multi-center reports, further studies are needed to explore the evidence of the findings.
出处
《中国针灸》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2010年第9期787-792,共6页
Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion
基金
2008吉林省科技发展计划资助项目:20080153
吉林省教育厅科研基金资助项目:吉教科合字2009第82号
关键词
针灸疗法
哮喘
随机对照试验
META分析
Acupuncture-Moxibustion
Asthma
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT)
Meta-Analysis