期刊文献+

颈椎融合术对邻近节段矢状位活动度影响研究 被引量:4

Adjacent segment mobility after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 探讨颈椎融合术对颈椎邻近节段矢状位活动度的影响.方法 应用回顾性研究的方法,选取北京积水潭医院1999年1月至2006年12月颈前路减压融合手术患者28例,收集患者术前及末次随访影像学资料,评价植骨融合率、融合节段近端、远端节段矢状位活动度、下颈椎整体矢状位活动度.结果 患者术后平均随访(6.3±1.6)年,X线评价融合节段融合率为100%,对融合节段上、下邻近节段矢状位活动度术前与随访相比较,无统计学差异.而下颈椎矢状位总体活动度明显下降,单节段融合术前(46.8±13.4)°,随访时(36.8±9.6)°,差异有统计学意义(t=3.042,P=0.007),活动度平均减少16.8% 而双节段融合术前48.6°±14.6°,随访时(39.9±7.2)°,差异有统计学意义(t=5.064,P<0.01),活动度平均减少35.6%.结论 颈椎融合手术仍是颈椎结构重建的良好方法,短节段融合术并没有增加邻近节段的屈伸活动度,而对下颈椎整体屈伸活动度有一定影响. Objective To investigate the mobility changes of adjacent segments after fusion retrospectively. Methods A total of 28 patients underwent standard anterior cervical arthrodesis. The kinematic changes occurred at segments adjacent to cervical arthrodesis through a coral bone graft and plating system. The mean follow-up period was 6. 3±1.6 years (3. 6 - 10. 5 ). Lateral radiographic views of cervical spine in flexion and extension were obtained at pre-operation and follow-up. Rotational motion at adjacent levels was quantified. Results Sagittal range of motion ( ROM ) at adjacent cranial level was 11.2°± 5.0° at pre-operation and 11.4°± 6.4°at follow-up. It was not statistically significant ( P 〉 0. 01 ).At adjacent caudal level, ROM was 9. 8°±5. 3°, but 10. 2°±4. 6°at follow-up. But it was not statistically significant ( P 〉0. 01 ). During the follow-up, entire cervical motion ( C2-C7 ) decreased significantly from 46. 8°± 13.4° to 36. 8°± 9. 6° in single-level fusion group, but from 48.6°± 14. 6° to 39. 9°± 7. 2° in double-level fusion group. Conclusion The assumption of an iatrogenically elevated adjacent level mobility by cervical fusion is refuted by the present study.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2010年第35期2458-2460,共3页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 脊柱融合术 颈椎 活动范围 关节 Cervical vertebrae Spinal fusion Range of motion,articular
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Yoon ST,Howard SA.Cervical Degnerative disc disease//Vaccaro AR,Betz RR,Zeidman SM.Principles and practice of spine surgery.Philadelphia:Mosby,2003:319-332.
  • 2Kurz LT,Overholt DP.Spine Industry Report.New York:Merrill Lynch Inc NY,2001.
  • 3Hilibrand AS,Carlson GD,Palumbo MA,et al.Radiculopathy and myelopathy at segments adjacent to the site of a previous anterior cervical arthrodesis.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1999,81:519-528.
  • 4Hilibrand AS,Robbins M.Adjacent segment degeneration and adjacent segment disease:the consequences of spinal fusion? Spine J,2004,4Suppl 6:190-194.
  • 5Herkowitz HN,Kurz LT,Overholt DP.Surgical management of cervical soft disc herniation:a comparison between the anterior and posterior approach.Spine,1990,15:1026-1030.
  • 6Lunsford LD,Bissonette DJ,Jannetta PJ,et al.Anterior surgery for cervical disc disease,part 1:treatment of lateral cervical disc herniation in 253 cases.J Neurosurg,1980,53:1-11.
  • 7Henderson CM,Hennessy RG,Shuey HM,et al.Posteriorlateral foraminotomy as an exclusive operative techinque for cervical radiculopathy:a review of 846 consecutively operated cases.Neurosurgery,1983,13:504-512.
  • 8Seo M,Choi D.Adjacent segment disease after fusion for cervical spondylosis; myth or reality? Br J Neurosurg,2008,22:195-199.
  • 9Diekerman RD,Reynolds AS,Rashbaum R,et.al.Adjacent segment degeneration:time is not as important as facet preservation ! Acta Orthop,2008,79:452-453.
  • 10Botelho RV,Moraes OJ,Fernandes GA,et al.A systematic review of randomized trials on the effect of cervical disc arthroplasty on reducing adjacent-level degeneration.Neurosurg Focus,2010,28:5.

共引文献1

同被引文献56

  • 1刘亚军,田伟,刘波,李勤,胡临,李志宇,袁强,孙玉珍.CT三维导航系统辅助颈椎椎弓根螺钉内固定技术的临床应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2005,7(7):630-633. 被引量:44
  • 2刘洪,Hirokazu Ishihara,智慧明.颈椎前路椎间融合术后邻近节段的病变研究[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(9):649-652. 被引量:7
  • 3Onari K, Akiyama N, Kondo S,et al. Long-term follow-up results of anterior interbody fusion applied for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26: 488-493.
  • 4Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Arishima Y, et al. Quality of life in elderly patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine( Phila Pa 1976), 2001, 26 : 494-498.
  • 5Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, et ah A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine( Phila Pa 1976), 2008, 33 : E990-993.
  • 6Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, et al. Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament:Part 1 : Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine(Phila Pa 1976) , 2007, 32: 647-653.
  • 7Hanakita J, Suwa H, Namura S, et al. The significance of the cervical soft disc herniation in the ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine( Phila Pa 1976), 1994,19:412-418.
  • 8Chang H, Kong CG, Won HY, et al. Inter- and intra-observer variability of a cervical OPLL classification using reconstructed CT images. Clin Orthop Surg, 2010, 2: 8-12.
  • 9Epstein N. Diagnosis and surgical management of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine J, 2002, 2:436-449.
  • 10Epstein NE. Advanced cervical spondylosis with ossification into the posterior longitudinal ligament and resultant neurologic sequelae. J Spinal Disord, 1996, 9: 477-484.

引证文献4

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部