期刊文献+

后路减压松解复位内固定椎体间植骨治疗峡部裂性腰椎滑脱的疗效分析 被引量:4

Treatment efficacy of posterior decompression,release and reduction,internal fixation and interbody bone grafting for spondylolisthesis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨松解、减压、后路固定、椎体间植骨治疗腰椎滑脱的临床疗效。方法对19例峡部裂性腰椎滑脱患者采用后路减压松解复位内固定椎体间植骨术治疗。结果随访10~24个月,优良率89.5%。结论后路减压松解复位内固定椎体间植骨术治疗腰椎滑脱效果明显,滑脱椎复位满意,植骨融合可靠。 Aim To investigate the clinical efficacy of the release and reduction,decompression,posterior fixation,interbody bone graft-ing for the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis.Methods 19 cases of spondylolis thesis were treated with posterior decompression,re-lease and reduction,internal fixation and interbody bone grafting surgery.Results Follow-up for 10to24 months showed that 89.5% of 19 cases of spondylolisthesis achieved good therapeutic effect.Conclusion The therapy of posterior decompression,release and reduc-tion,internal fixation and interbody bone grafting for the treatment of spondylolisthesis proves remarkably effective,with satisfactory reduc-tion of lumbar spondylolisthesis and reliable graft bone fusion.
出处 《安徽医药》 CAS 2010年第10期1170-1171,共2页 Anhui Medical and Pharmaceutical Journal
关键词 腰椎滑脱 松解复位 内固定 减压 椎间植骨 spondylolisthesis reduction internal fixation decompression interbody bone grafting
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1郝定均,温世明,窦榆生.椎间融合器与椎弓根钉固定治疗腰椎滑脱症的比较研究[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2005,20(3):145-147. 被引量:23
  • 2申勇,吴华荣,苗成利,杨大龙.成人峡部裂性腰椎滑脱病理进展的初步探讨[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(9):697-699. 被引量:18
  • 3Lin PM. Posterior lumbar interbodv fusion technique,compli-cations and pitfalls[J].Clin Orthop,1985,193 :90-102.
  • 4Verlooy J, De Smedt K,Selosse P.Failme of a modified poste-rior lumbar interbody fusion technique to produce adequate pain relief in isthmie spondylolytie grade 1 spondylolisthesis patients[J].Spine, 1993,18(11) : 1491-1495.
  • 5Suk S,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al. Adding posterior lumbar inter-bodv fusion to pediele screw fixation and posterolateral fusion after decompression in spondylolytic spnndylolisthesis [J].Spine, 1997,22 (2) : 210-220.
  • 6Schlegel KF,Pon A,Biomechanics of posterior lumbar interbody fusion in spondylolisthesis[J].Clin Orthop, 1985,193:115-119.
  • 7Madan S, Boeree NR.Outcome of posterior interbodv fusion versus posterolateral fusion for spond?,lolytie spondylolisthesis[J].Spine, 2002,27 ( 14 ) : 1536-1542.
  • 8Nork SE,Hu SS,Workrnan KI,et al. Patient outcome after de-compression and instrumented posterior spinal Iusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine. 1999,24(6) :561-569.
  • 9Kim NH,Lee JW.Anterior interbody Iusion versus posterolater-al fusion with transpedicular fixation for isthmic, spondylnlis-thesis in adults[J].Spine. 1999,24(8) :812-817.
  • 10Booth KC,Bridwell KH,Eisenberg BA,et al. Mininmm 5-year results of degenerative spondylolisthesis treated with decnm-pression and instrumented posterior fusion [J].Spine, 1999,24(16) : 1721-1727.

共引文献490

同被引文献25

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部