期刊文献+

问责研究的主要理论与述评 被引量:4

Review on Theories of Accountability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 问责是社会的普遍特征,是社会秩序的前提,问责已渗透到社会的各个领域。本文介绍了问责研究的三角模型、金字塔模型、社会权变模型和中观理论,并在此基础上阐述了各个理论的优缺点,最后指出了上述理论对实践的启示意义。 Incorporating into every field in society, accountability is universal and antecedent for the social order. In our paper, four theories-the triangle model, the pyramid model, the social contingency model, and the meso-level theory, were elaborated. Then the strengths and weaknesses of the four theories were indicated. And finally the practical implication of the theories was illustrated.
出处 《心理研究》 2010年第5期52-58,共7页 Psychological Research
基金 国家自然科学基金重点项目(70732001)
关键词 问责 三角模型 金字塔模型 社会权变模型 中观理论 accountability triangle model pyramid model social contingency model meso-level theory
  • 相关文献

参考文献43

  • 1Schlenker B R, Weigold M F, Doherty K. Coping with accountability: Self-identification and evaluative reckonings. In Snyder C R, Forsyth D R. (Eds.). The handbook of social and clinical psychology. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press, 1991:96-115.
  • 2Tetlock P E. Accountability theory: Mixing properties of human agents with properties of social systems. In Thompson L L, Levine J M, Messick D M. Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge. Mawah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999:117-138.
  • 3Cropanzano R, Chrobot-Mason D, Rupp D E, Prehar C A. Accountability for corporate injustice. Human Resource Management Review, 2004, 1: 107-133.
  • 4Jr. Wood J A, Winston B E. Toward a new' understanding of leader accountability: Defining a critical construct. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 2005, 11(3): 84-94.
  • 5Schlenker B R, Britt T W, Pennington J, Murphy R, Doherty K. The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 1994, 101(4): 632-652.
  • 6Leary M R, Kowalski R M, Bergen D J. Interpersonal information acquisition and confidence in first encounters. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 1988, 14(1): 68-77.
  • 7Schlenker B R, Weigold M F. Interpersonal processes involving impression regulation and management. Annual Review of Psychology, 1992, 43(1): 133-168.
  • 8Lerner J S, Tetlock P E. Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychological Bulletin, 1999, 125 (2) : 255-275.
  • 9Lerner J S, Tetlock P E. Bridging individual, interpersonal, and institutional approaches to judgment and choice: The impact of accountability on cognitive bias. In Schneider S, Shanteau J (Eds.). Emerging perspectives in judgment and decision making. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 2002:431-457.
  • 10Tetlock P E. The impact of accountability on judgment and choice: Toward a social contingency model. In Zanna M P. Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Academic Press, 1992:331-376.

同被引文献78

  • 1叶仁荪,王玉芹,林泽炎.工作满意度、组织承诺对国企员工离职影响的实证研究[J].管理世界,2005,21(3):122-125. 被引量:93
  • 2李劲松.国外组织责任行为研究模式评介[J].外国经济与管理,2007,29(7):30-34. 被引量:5
  • 3张正堂,赵曙明.欠发达地区企业知识员工异地离职动因的实证研究:以苏北地区为例[J].管理世界,2007,23(8):95-103. 被引量:18
  • 4http://www.1inkshop.corn.cn/web/archives/2012/220345.shtml.
  • 5Anderson, N., 1981, "Integration Theory Applied to Cognitive Responses and Attitudes", in R. Petty, T. Ostrom and T. Brock. (Eds.), Cognitizje Responses in Persuasion, H&dale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.
  • 6Bandura, A., 1977, Social Learning Theory, Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
  • 7Bandura, A., 1986, "Social Foundations of Thought andAction", Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • 8Berg, B. L., 2001, Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (Fourth Edition),Pearson Education Company.
  • 9Berheim, J. B., 1992, "Reinforcing Ethics at Work", The Human Resource Professional, 4 (2), pp.55-58.
  • 10Bonner, E. T. and H. Friedman, 2011, "A Conceptual Clarification of the Experience of Awe: An Interpretative Phenom- enological Analysis" , The Humanistic Psychologist, 39, pp.222- 235.

引证文献4

二级引证文献28

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部