期刊文献+

抗感染重组合异种骨生物活性的研究 被引量:3

Bioactivity of Antibiotic Supplemented Reconsitituted Bone Xenograft
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探索开放性骨折骨缺损一期植骨的新途径。材料和方法:以重组合异种骨为载体,采用庆大霉素溶液浸泡和庆大霉素———明胶包裹2种方法制成复合植骨材料,以小鼠肌袋法分别观察此复合植骨材料的成骨活性和体内药物释放特性。结果:2种复合材料的成骨活性均与单纯重组合异种骨无明显差别(P>005),均较单纯牛松质骨载体成骨活性好(P<001)。2种复合材料均于3d内骨粒及其周围软组织的庆大霉素浓度高于金黄色葡萄球菌的最小抑菌浓度,12h时在软组织中分别产生1656μg/ml和3045μg/ml的高浓度。结论:抗感染重组合异种骨有较好成骨活性和一定的抗感染能力,具有较好的临床应用前景。 Objective:This study was designed to explore new ways of bone grafting during primary care in treating contaminated bony defects.Methods:Two approaches were employed:RBX impregnated with gentamicin solution;RBX covered with mixture of collagen and gentamicin.Results:Bioassay in mouse thigh pouch showed that there was no significant difference in osteo inductivity between antibiotic supplemented RBX and RBX alone in same dose of BMP( P >0 05),but demonstrated stronger osteoinductive activity compared to bovine cancellous carrier ( P <0 01).While 169 6μg/ml was detected in the eluate around RBX impregnated with gentimicin bone powder at 12h,and within 4 days,the concentration was above the MIC of S.aureus;304 5μg/ml was detected in the eluate around RBX covered with mixture of collagen and gentamicin bone power,and within 3 days,the concentration was above the MIC of S aurers.Conclusion:Antibiotic supplemented RBX has high osteoinductive activity and bactericidal activity,thus predict its potential use in treating contaminated bony defeats.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 1999年第5期353-355,共3页 Orthopedic Journal of China
基金 军队"九五"指令性课题基金
关键词 异种骨移植 庆大霉素 骨生成 药物浓度 Bone xenograft Gentamicin Osteoinduction Drug concentration.
  • 相关文献

同被引文献17

  • 1胡蕴玉,陆裕朴.重组合异种骨的实验研究与临床应用[J].中华外科杂志,1993,31(12):709-713. 被引量:114
  • 2[1]Templeman DC, Gulli B, Tsukayama DT, et al. Update on the management of open fractures of the tibial shaft. Clin Orthop, 1998;(350):18
  • 3[3]Watson JT, Anders M, Moed BR. Management strategies for bone loss in tibial shaft fractures. Clin Orthop, 1995;(315):138
  • 4[5]Muhr G, Ostermann P. Treatment of open fractures exemplified by tibial shaft fracture. Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich, 1997;91(5):415
  • 5[6]Hansis M. When is antibiotic prophylaxis required? Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd, 1996;113:708
  • 6[7]Li XD, Hu YY. The treatment of osteomyelitis with gentamicin-reconstituted bone xenograft-composite. J Bone Joint Surg(Br),2001;83 (7):1 063
  • 7[8]Moehring HD, Gravel C, Chapman MW, et al. Comparison of antibiotic beads and intravenous antibiotics in open fractures. Clin Orthop, 2000;(372):254
  • 8[9]Keating JF, Blachut PA, O′Brien PJ, et al. Reamed nailing of open tibial fractures: does the antibiotic bead pouch reduce the deep infection rate? J Orthop Trauma, 1996;10(5):298
  • 9[10]Ostermann PA, Seligson D, Henry SL. Local antibiotic therapy for severe open fractures. A review of 1 085 consecutive cases. J Bone Joint Surg(Br), 1995;77(1):93
  • 10[12]Patzakis MJ, Bains RS, Lee J, et al. Prospective, randomized, double-blind study comparing single-agent antibiotic therapy, ciprofloxacin, to combination antibiotic therapy in open fracture wounds. J Orthop Trauma, 2000;14(8):529

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部