般若与玄学——论唐君毅对《肇论·物不迁论》的哲学诠释

Communication between Prajna and Xuanxue——On Tang Junyi' s Philosophical Interpretation about the Immutability of Thing in Zhao Lun

唐君毅解读《肇论.物不迁论》,认为其般若学的主旨与立言方式皆与玄学相契合。首先对唐君毅这一哲学诠释的特色进行了探讨,指出这一诠释路向实际上含有对《物不迁论》的误读、误解;分析了《物不迁论》中是如何言说般若义理的,指出其言说特点在于"转俗见为真见",这一番转折或是唐君毅出现误读、误解的原因;并探讨了佛教所界定的自身义理与玄学理论的差别之所在,认为唐君毅所谓"般若与玄学相通"、"《物不迁论》兼通般若与玄学"的说法,其实是很难成立的。在某种意义上,对唐君毅之《物不迁论》哲学诠释的考察,可以视为民国时期熊十力《新唯识论》所引发激烈争论的余绪。

Tang Junyi holds that both the theme and saying way of The Immutability of Thing conjunct with Xuanxue Learning. This paper first discusses the feature of Tang＇ s theory,points that Tang＇ s interpretation have some misunderstanding or distortion to The Immutability of Thing; this paper analysises the way of Prajna saying in The Immutability of Thing,points that its feature of saying is a transition from the insight of common customs to the insight of truth,and this transition maybe is the reason of Tang＇ misunderstanding or distortion. This paper also discusses the difference of Buddhist theory and Xuanxue Learning that Buddhism consides itself,holds that Tang＇ s theory such as the intercommunication of Prajna and Xuanxue Learning in The Immutability of Thing,is incorrect. In some sense,this paper＇ s study about Tang＇ s philosophical interpretation is a repercussions of the great debate about New Mere-consciousness Theory of Xiong Shili in the period of the Republic of China.