期刊文献+

新生儿泪囊炎的治疗时机与方法

The therapy opportunity and method of dacryocystitis neonatorum
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨新生儿泪囊炎的最佳治疗时机和方法。方法回顾性分析2005年6月~2009年5月在新郑市辛店镇中心卫生院眼科门诊就诊的94例105眼新生儿泪囊炎患儿,其中男56例62眼(59.05%),女38例43眼(40.95%),年龄1~14个月,平均(4.25±1.03)个月。治疗方法包括抗生素眼液点眼、按摩泪囊区、冲洗泪道及探通冲洗泪道。结果药物治疗1周及泪道冲洗1次无效后,年龄大于1个月,经患儿家属知情同意,给予泪道探通术。经泪道探通治疗后,新生儿泪囊炎治愈率为93.33%。小于6个月的患儿治疗效果较大于6个月的患儿要好,差异有统计学意义。结论新生儿泪囊炎一旦发现,短期保守治疗无效即可行泪道探通治疗,泪道探通术是治疗新生儿泪囊炎安全有效的方法。 Objective To discuss the dacryocystitis neonatorum's best therapy opportunity and the method. Methods Retrospective analysis: 94 dacryocystitis neonatorom babies, 105 eyes in all, 56 males, 62 eyes ( 59.05 % ), 38 females 43 eyes (40.95%) ,age 1 - 14 months,average (4.25 + 1.03 ) months of the total,durlng June 2005 to May 2009 in Xinzheng Xindian town health center ophthalmology department outpatient service. The therapy device include the utilization of antibiotic eye drops, the massage of lacrimal sac area, the irrigation of lacrimal passage and the probing of lacrimal passage. Results If it is ineffective after drug treatment or the irrigation of lacrimal passage, we can confer the probing of lacrimal passage among the babies who aged older than one month. Through the probing of lacrimal passage, the cure rate achieves 93.33%. The therapeutic effect who younger than six months is better than who older than six months, they had significant difference . Conclusion Oneethe daeryoeystitis neonatorum was discovered,the probing of lacrimal passage is the safe and valid mode.
出处 《中国医学创新》 CAS 2010年第25期31-32,共2页 Medical Innovation of China
关键词 泪囊炎 新生儿 泪道探通术 Dacryocystisis Neonate Probing of lacrimal passage
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献15

  • 1陈进波,陈子林,黄涵.300例婴幼儿泪囊炎疗效观察[J].海南医学,2005,16(12):65-65. 被引量:7
  • 2[1]Paul TO, Shepherd R. Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: natural history and the timing of optimal intervention[J]. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 1994;31∶362-367.
  • 3[2]Baggio E, Ruban J, Sandon K. Early probing of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction∶ an analysis of 92 cases[J]. J Fr Ophthalmol 2000;23(7)∶655-662.
  • 4[3]Robb RM. Success rates of nasolacrimal duct probing at time intervals after 1 year of age[J].Ophthalmology 1998;105(7)∶1307-1309.
  • 5[4]Yap EY, Yip CC. Outcome of late probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in Singapore children[J].Int Ophthalmol 1997-1998;21(6)∶331-334.
  • 6[5]Mannor GE, Rose GE, Frimpong-Ansah K, Ezra E. Factors affecting the success of nasolacrimal duct probing for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Am J Ophthalmol 1999 ;127(5)∶616-617.
  • 7[6]Hargrave MA. Nasolacrimal duct obstruction[J]. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1991;19(4)∶367-369.
  • 8[8]Tahat AA. Dacryostenosis in newborns: probing, or syringing, or both[J]? Eur J Ophthalmol 2000;10(2)∶128-131.
  • 9李康英,谢光辉,黄霈,张翼飞,张君娴.鼻泪管内KTP激光重建术治疗慢性泪囊炎[J].中国实用眼科杂志,1997,15(5):310-311. 被引量:21
  • 10GreenSDR,HungaF,Chees broughJS,et aL.The treatment of neonatal meningitis due to gram negative bacilli with ciprOflOxacin:evidence of satisfactory penerration into into CSF.Joumal of injection[J].1993,26 (2):253-264.

共引文献149

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部