期刊文献+

ESHAP方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤14例分析 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价ESHAP(PDD,VPl6,Ara-C,甲泼尼龙)方案治疗难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤近期疗效及不良反应观察。方法 14例难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者行ESHAP方案化疗3周期。每3周重复,每例均应用3个疗程。结果 CR 6例,PR 3例,SD 3例,PD 2例.有效率(CR+PR)64.2%。不良反应主要为骨髓抑制、血糖升高。白细胞减少57%,血小板减少44%;28%患者出现血糖升高。白细胞、血小板经G-CSF及输注血小板后恢复正常;血糖应用胰岛素控制。结论 ESHAP方案治疗复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效肯定,不良反应可以耐受。
出处 《中国误诊学杂志》 CAS 2010年第28期7018-7018,共1页 Chinese Journal of Misdiagnostics
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献31

  • 1蒋参,苏震雄.CVBP方案治疗复发与难治性非霍奇金氏淋巴瘤[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2005,10(3):315-316. 被引量:2
  • 2潘启超.长春碱类的新进展──失碳长春碱[J].癌症,1996,15(3):228-231. 被引量:276
  • 3杨晟,何晓慧.恶性淋巴瘤的耐药及防治[J].中国医刊,2005,40(11):17-19. 被引量:2
  • 4范云,黄志煜,罗吕宏,余海峰.MINE方案治疗复发或耐药的侵袭性淋巴瘤临床观察[J].癌症,2005,24(12):1503-1506. 被引量:17
  • 5管忠震 喻丽华 何友兼 等.用 CHOP方案治疗非霍奇金氏淋巴瘤[J].癌症,1998,8(2):98-100.
  • 6Messori A, Vaiani M, Yrippoli S, et al. Survival in patients with intermediate or high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: meta-analysis of randomized studies comparing third generation regiments with CHOP[J]. Cancer,2001,84(3 ) :303 -307.
  • 7Velasquez WS, Cababillas F,Salvador P, et al. Effective salvage therapy for lymphoma with cisplatin in combination with high- dose Ara-c and dexamethasone (DHAP) [J ]. Blood, 1988,71 (1): 117 - 122.
  • 8Velasquez P, McLaughlin S, Tucker FB, et al. ESHAP-An effective chemotherapy regimen in refractory and relapsing lymphoma : A 4-year follow-up study [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 1994,12 (6) : 1169 -1176.
  • 9Ozturk MA, Barista I, Ahundag MK,et al. Modified ESHAP as salvage chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: Results of a single-center study of 32 patients [ J ]. Chemotherpy,2002,48 ( 5 ) : 252 - 258.
  • 10Mercadal S, Briones J, Xieoy B, et al. Intensive chemotherapy (high-dose CHOP/ESHAP regimen ) followed by autologous stem-cell transplantation in previously untreated patients with peripheral T-cell lymphoma[J]. Ann Oncol, 2008,19(5) :958 - 963.

共引文献7

同被引文献18

  • 1韩艳秋,曹丽霞,郝璐.ESHAP方案治疗难治性或复发性非霍奇金淋巴瘤疗效观察[J].中国医师杂志,2007,9(4):557-558. 被引量:2
  • 2Kimby E, Brandt L, Nygren P, et al. A systematic overview of chem2 otherapy effects in aggressive non - I-Iodgkin' s iymphoma [J]. Acta 0ncol,2001,40(2 - 3) : 198 - 212.
  • 3Fwasher R I, Gaynor ER, Dahlberg S, et al. Comparison of a stand2 ard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens forad- vaneednon - Hodgkins[J]. N EnglJMed, 1993,328(2) : 1002 - 1006.
  • 4邓家栋 杨崇礼 杨天楹 等.临床血液学[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2001.1085-1090.
  • 5Grillo Lopez AJ,Cheson BD,Homing SJ,et al.Response criteria for NHL:important of nomal lymph node size and correlations with response rates[J].Ann Oncol,2000,11(4):399-408.
  • 6Jackson G,Taylor P,Smith GM,et al.A multicentre,open,noncomparative phase II study of a combination of fludarabine phosphate,cytarabine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in relapsed and refractory acute myeloid leukemia and de novo refractory anemia with excess blasts in transformation[J].Br J Haematol,2001,112(1):127-137.
  • 7万军.DHAP方案治疗复发难治性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效观察[J].医疗前沿,2013,5(17):215-217.
  • 8Kimby E,Brandt L,Nygren P,et al.A systematic overview of chemotherapy effects in aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma[J].Acta Oncol,2001,40(2-3):198-212.
  • 9Kogure Y,Yoshimi A,Ueda K,et al.Modified ESHAP regimen for relapsed/refractory T cell Lymphoma:a retrospective analysis[J].Ann Hematol,2015,12(2):678-782.
  • 10胡倩,俞康,叶海格,毕来喜,梁彬,沈志坚,江松福.CHNP和CHOP方案治疗非霍奇金淋巴瘤的临床疗效和安全性比较[J].中国肿瘤临床与康复,2008,15(3):224-226. 被引量:4

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部