期刊文献+

农村居民健康公平性研究——以迁安市为例 被引量:3

Study on Health Equality of Rural Residents
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]从经济收入角度探讨了迁安市居民的健康公平现状,为迁安市优化卫生资源配置提供基础信息及参考依据。[方法]利用2006年迁安市卫生资源配置调查资料,以迁安市农村居民为研究对象,以经济收入作为分层的客观变量,以居民两周患病人次数作为评价健康状况的指标,选用洛伦兹曲线与基尼系数和差异指数法,对迁安市的健康公平性现状进行分析。[结果]Lorenz曲线与公平线比较接近,位于公平线的上方,不同经济收入水平下2周患病人次数的基尼系数分别为0.108355,差异指数ID为0.0735。[结论]不同经济收入水平下的健康状况存在差异,但相对比较公平。 [Objective] The aim was to explore the health equity among the countryside residents in Qian'an City and provide theory evidences for the government policy and method references to the similar research. [Method] The data was from the medical resource allocation survey in Qian'an City,the research object was the countryside resident in Qian'an,economic income was selected to differentiate variables and the two-week disease's prevalence rate were selected to evaluate the health equality. Lorenz curve and index of dissimilarity was used to analyze the health equality in difference economic income people. [Result] Lorenz curve was under equity curve and was relatively close with equity lines. Gini coefficient by the Lorenz curve was 0.108 355 and the index of dissimilarity was 0.073 5. [Conclusion] The health in different economic level is relative equity.
机构地区 华北煤炭医学院
出处 《安徽农业科学》 CAS 北大核心 2010年第23期12842-12843,共2页 Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
基金 河北省科技厅资助项目(20072077) 河北省唐山市科技局课题(08130202C)
关键词 健康公平性 洛伦兹曲线 基尼系数 差异指数 Health equality Lorenz curve Gini coefficient Index of dissimilarity
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献33

  • 1Adrienne E J M Cavelaars, Anton E Kunst et el. Differences in self reported morbidity by educational level: A comparison of 11 Western Europe countries. Journal of Epidemiol Community Health, 1998, 52: 219-227.
  • 2Johan P Mackenbach et al. Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity and mortality in western Europe. The Lancet, 1997, 349(6) : 1655-1659.
  • 3Annette Leclerc et al. Differential mortality: Some comparisons between England and France, based on inequality measures. International Journal of Epidemiology, 1990, 19(4) : 1001-1010.
  • 4Tapani Valkonen. Health expectancy by level of education in Finland. Social Science and Medicine. 1997.44(6) :801-808.
  • 5Laura D. Kubzansky, Nancy Krieger et al. United States:Social inequality and the burden of poor health. In:Timothy Evans, Margaret Whitehead et al. Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. New York:Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 105-121.
  • 6Jeanette Vega, Rolf Dieter Hollstein et al. Chile: Socioeconomic differentials and mortality in a middle-income nation. In: Timothy Evans, Margaret Whitehead et al. Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. New York: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 123-137.
  • 7Sudhir Anand, Finn Diderichsen et al 2001 Measuring Disparities in Health: Methods and Indicators. In: Timothy Evans, Margaret Whitehead et al. Challenging Inequities in Health: From Ethics to Action. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 48-67.
  • 8Adam Wagstaff. On the measurement of inequalities in health. Sco. Sci.Med, 1991, 33(5) : 545-557.
  • 9Singh-Manoux,A. ,Adler,N. E. ,& Marmot,M. G. Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the Whitehall II study. social Science and Medicine,2003,(56):1321- 1333
  • 10WHO. Health systems: improving performance. The world health report 2000

共引文献145

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献17

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部