期刊文献+

政党类型与党内民主分析 被引量:5

An Analysis of the Types of Party and Democracy of Inner-Party
原文传递
导出
摘要 在不同国家、政党发展的不同阶段,政党观念不同,党内民主的理论与实践也有所不同。从历史发展看,西方政党经历了一个从近代权贵党向现代大众型政党、当代全方位党与卡特尔党的转变过程。不同类型的政党,其内部特点、党内关系不同,党内民主也有所不同。以党内集权度作为衡量党内民主的标准,当代主流政党可划分为寡头集权型、中央集权型、有限集权型、分权型四种类型。就英、美、德、俄四国主流政党而言,英国保守党属于寡头集权型、工党属于有限集权型,美国两大政党属于分权型,德国两大政党属于有限集权型,"统一俄罗斯党"属于寡头集权型、俄共属于中央集权型。对政党类型、党内关系与党内民主的比较分析,有利于认识党内民主的本质、价值、目标与限度以及党内民主理论与实践的多样性。 Because different countries have different concepts of political party at different stages of development of political parties,so the theory and practice of democracy is different.On the viewpoints of historical development,the Western political parties have a developing process from the elite party to the modern mass-party,and to the contemporary catch-all party and cartel party.Different party types have different characteristics,inner-relationships and inner-democratic.According to the degree of centralization within the party,the contemporary mainstream political parties can be divided into four types:oligarchy-authoritarian,centralization,limited centralization and decentralized political parties.Comparatively,the British Conservative Party tends to the type of oligarchy-authoritarian,the Labour Party tends to the type of limited centralization,the two major U.S.political parties belong to decentralized political parties,the two major political parties in Germany tend to the type of limited centralization,"United Russia Party" tends to the type of oligarchy-authoritarian,the Russian Communist Party belongs to the type of centralization.To comparatively analysis the types of parties and inner-party democracy can contribute to understand the essence,values,goals and limits of inner-party democracy,which can help us better understand the worldly diversity of the theory and practice of inner-party democracy.
作者 刘红凛
出处 《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第5期119-127,共9页 Journal of Renmin University of China
基金 国家社会科学基金项目"政党关系和谐与中国特色政党制度建设"(07BDJ022)
关键词 政党类型 政党特点 党内集权度 党内关系 党内民主 party type feature of party centralization degree of inner-party relation of inner-party democracy of inner-party
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1萨尔沃·马斯泰罗内.《欧洲民主史-从盂德斯鸠到凯尔森》,北京,社会科学文献出版社,1990.
  • 2罗伯特·米歇尔斯.《寡头统治铁律-现代民主制度中的政党社会学》,任军锋等译,天津:天津人民出版社,2003年,第35-36,189页.
  • 3Max Weber. Essays in Sociology. Oxford University Press, 1958.
  • 4罗伯特·达尔.《论民主》,李柏光、林猛译,北京:商务印书馆,1999年.
  • 5Otto Kirchheimer. "The Transformation of Western Europeans Party Systems". in Joseph La Palombara and Myron Weiner(eds. ). Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton University Press, 1966.
  • 6Giovanni Sartori. Parties and Party Systems. NewYork, Vail-Ballou Press, Inc. 1976.
  • 7希尔斯曼.《美国是如何治理的》,北京,商务印书馆,1986.
  • 8让·布隆代尔,毛里齐奥·科塔主编.《政党政府的性质》,北京,北京大学出版社,2006.
  • 9Maurice Duverger. Political Parties Their Organization & Active in the Modern States. Trans. from the French, London: Methuen & Co. , 1967.
  • 10Peter Mair. Party System Change: Approaches Interpretations. Oxford: Clarendon, 1997.

二级参考文献38

  • 1林尚立.有序民主化:论政党在中国政治发展中的重要作用[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,2004,44(6):5-13. 被引量:24
  • 2让·布隆代尔,毛里齐奥·科塔主编.《政党政府的性质》,北京,北京大学出版社,2006.
  • 3Max Weber. From Max Weber:Essays in Sociology. New York:Oxford University Press,1958.
  • 4哈罗德·F·戈斯内尔,理查德·G·斯莫尔卡.《美国政党和选举》,上海,上海译文出版社,1980.
  • 5D.B.杜鲁门.《政治过程》,天津,天津人民出版社,2005.
  • 6Divid L. Sills, Robert K. Merton (eds.) . International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 11. New York.. Mac Millam-Free Press, 1968.
  • 7梅里亚姆.《美国政治思想》,北京,商务印书馆,1984.
  • 8雷飞龙.《政党与政党制度之研究》,台北,韦伯文化国际出版有限公司,2002.
  • 9姜士林主编.《世界宪法全书》,青岛,青岛出版社,1998.
  • 10亨克·范·马尔塞文,格尔·范·德·唐.《成文宪法:通过计算机进行的比较研究》,北京,北京大学出版社,2007.

共引文献53

同被引文献58

引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部