我国公共图书馆治理主体设置模式的弊端及其建议

Disadvantages of the Mode of Governance Entity Setting of Public Libraries in China and Its Improvement Suggestions

文章以我国地方图书馆法规或行政规章为分析对象,认为我国公共图书馆治理主体设置模式存在诸多弊端:所有者主体的权力被虚置;缺失责任的建设主体和缺乏能力的建设主体并存;未能形成决策、执行、监督三个环节相分离的法人治理结构。针对这些弊端,文章提出的改进建议是:在治理主体的权力配置上,应赋予所有者主体以决定图书馆事务的最高权力;在建设主体设置上,应体现责任与能力对等的原则,实行多元化的建设主体设置格局,尤其要探索组建联合建设主体的可能性;在管理主体的设置上,应逐步推行理事会制,以此优化我国公共图书馆治理主体结构。

This paper takes local library regulations and administrative rules in China as analysis objects and believes that there are many disadvantages in setting modes of public library＇s governance subjects. For example, the power of the owner is nominal; irresponsible and incapacity construction subjects co - exist; the corporate governance, in which decision, implementation and supervision is separated, is not shaped. Accordingly, the paper suggests that in terms of power allocation of governance subjects, the owner should be given the highest authority to determine issues of public libraries; in terms of setting construction subjects, the principal that responsibility and ability matches should be embodied and we should diversify setting patterns of construction subjects and especially explore the possibility of joint construction subjects ; in terms of setting management subjects, we should gradually introduce board system to optimize the structure of governance subjects of public libraries in China.